#Doc013* - Nikki SINCLAIRE RESIGNS FROM PAN EU EFD PARTY GROUPING

 #Doc013* - Nikki SINCLAIRE RESIGNS FROM PAN EU EFD PARTY GROUPING

Nicole Sinclaire MEP

44 Velsheda Road, Solihull B90 2JN

TEl 0794 146 1255 email nikkisinclaire@hotmail.com

Nicole Sinclaire MEP: Change of Group

With effect from 18 January, I shall move from the EFD Group in the European Parliament to the Non-Attached Group. The latter is composed of non-aligned MEPs, independent of each other.

I have decided to move to this non-attached group as I have found it increasingly difficult to justify sitting alongside one or two of the European parties within the EFD Group who have a variety of extremist views which includes anti-Semitism, violence and the espousal of a single European policy on immigration. One of these parties, Liga Nord which was expelled from the previous Ind Dem Group, currently holds the Group Presidency jointly with UKIP.

In addition, a particular difficulty has arisen for me with the prospect of EFD joining a PAN-European Party whose aim is Party enhancement within the EU rather than extraction from it, to which I am implacably opposed.

My working relationship and trust with EFD Co-President, Nigel Farage has broken down since his personal admittance to me recently that he wished I had not been elected. The comment “I wish I had only 12 not 13 MEP`s” was made to many people in the aftermath of the European Elections. I have found this personal animosity difficult to work with.

I would also like to point out that on a pre arranged interview on the BBC West Midlands Politics Show, Mike Nattrass and I had to spent two thirds of the time defending our membership of the EFD Group and Nigel’s public remarks made about leadership candidates ‘not being credible’.

I have discussed my position at length with the Leader of UKIP, Lord Pearson, who understands my viewpoint and has assured me of his support both now and in the future in my continued work for UKIP. My move to the non-attached group therefore will not affect in any way my position as a UKIP MEP for the West Midlands.

I shall continue to work closely with my West Midlands colleague, Mike Nattrass, MEP and with UKIP's other MEPs for the promotion of UKIP's cause in the forthcoming General Election and thereafter. And I will support Nigel Farage's fight for the Buckingham seat which would be a breakthrough for UKIP and our cause. I am committed to support the West Midlands and the Party financially, as previously outlined, and indeed, hope to increase this support in the near future.

I would sincerely hope that the usual process of disinformation does not ensue. We have bigger battles to face. I would be most grateful if you would kindly contact me directly to discuss any concerns you have.

Kind regards

Nikki Sinclaire MEP


To view other articles regarding this topic: CLICK HERE 

& several subsequent blogs on the same site.

#Doc010* - Niall WARRY'S RESIGNATION LETTER

#Doc010* - Niall WARRY'S RESIGNATION LETTER

First Published at: CLICK HERE
#792* - ANOTHER LONG SERVING ACTIVIST & SUPPORTER OF EUkip QUITS

ANOTHER LONG SERVING ACTIVIST WITH 12 YEARS SERVICE AS A SUPPORTER OF EUkip  FINALLY QUITS IN SADNESS AT THE PARTY'S BETRAYAL OF BRITAIN!

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

During over 10 years in UKIP in which I was National Chairman of Wales, Officer Manager in Birmingham for 6 months, Branch Chairman of Cheltenham, stood in 3 General Elections (The first being with the Referendum Party in 1997), 1 Euro and 1 Local Election I am finally leaving the Party and will not be renewing my membership this February.

My last 5 years I have spent trying to raise the standards of the party to make it electable in its own right. Many of us believe it is not more politicians we need, but to leave the EU. Our failure to achieve this and set a clear direction for the party has been reflected by the abject failure of UKIP to achieve anything at all towards leaving the EU.

The lack of probity and transparency has dogged the party escalating under Nigel’s leadership. Sadly it looks as if UKIP have learnt from the EU and not exposed it! Furthermore and nearly as important the party has suffered from abysmal leadership and lacked an overall plan and has never adopted a workable strategy or tactics that would help it achieve its primary reason for being.

Many of UKIP’s most able and well informed members saw the writing on the wall when Nigel was elected leader and left the party then. Nigel never wanted to be leader, a job he was totally unsuited for, but he fought for the post to ensure that his comfortable EU existence on the gravy train was NOT disturbed.

Now of course despite a new puppet leader, in Lord Pearson, Nigel has marched his MEPs into the EFD Group, in the EU pretend Parliament, a group that has people in it who are even worse that our own BNP.

Despite an increasingly Eurosceptic public UKIP’s membership has declined from around a high of 29,000 in 2004 to 13,000 today. This is clearly an indication that all is NOT well in UKIP.

Life after the ratification of The Lisbon Treaty has changed many things and I now believe UKIP is not only beyond reform but that reformed or otherwise it is now largely irrelevant to us being able to leave the EU.

So before I finish I think it only fair to explain the type of party I hoped to be working towards:-

A party open to all regardless of race colour or creed which used its successes in the Euro Elections to fund the essential work in the UK to educate the public about the reality of being part of the EU.

UKIP MEPs should have had the strength of character to stand in the EU Parliament on their own while spending far more of their time in the UK rather than Brussels.

Full transparency of MEPs accounts should have been mandatory.

The party should have initially concentrated on providing electoral pressure on the LibLabCon turning success in this area to its advantage to build into a fully fledged party when the time was right.

The MEPs should have used their elected status to lead the drive to educate the British people cascading the information down through the membership to the general public.

Training and more training should have been carried out at every level and PPCs for General Elections should have received endless in house training to fashion them into a competent professional candidate.

Candidates should have been able to stand as UKIP then put in brackets New Labour, Conservative or Liberal Democrats thus instantly doing away with the need for any time wasting on producing ‘policies’ as it would have been all too clear as to a candidates beliefs.

So a UKIP (New Labour) candidate would have been saying to the electorate I believe in New Labour policies but on the EU I’m for coming out.

As to the future I believe that one of the existing parties will eventually have to offer the people a referendum on the IN or OUT option as it becomes increasing clear how disadvantaged we are by the Lisbon Treaty.

Having given up on UKIP and the LibLabCon I believe my only honourable option at the next General Election is to stand as an Independent candidate and have set this in motion already in my constituency having distributed 5,000 leaflets already with another 5,000 to follow in January (Why isn’t UKIP thinking this far ahead!).

Details of my initiative can be found at :-

http://niallwarry.blogspot.com

So farewell UKIP a party that promised so much and delivered so little for the PEOPLE of the UK that is apart from the self enrichment of its 13 MEPs.

  
I gather Niall Warry intends to stand as an Indipendent Parliamentary Candidate in The General Election in his home constituency of Sommerton & Frome. Niall's blog outlines his views on many subjects and makes it very clear that the aim is not only to stand as an Independent realising his unlikely lack of success but with a determination to ensure the constituency is not just another cosy LibLabCon stitch up and since at EUkip's last meeting only 2 people attended and although it was only the second meeting for Niall he had 11 people attend and over 15 named apologies.


As a result of his efforts in the constituency to date he has had offers of not only support but also financial contributions that have already covered his deposit and print costs - the leaflet is now in its second print run and he has at least one organiser in every main village in the constituency and the printing of his leaflet is already designed and with the printers all fully funded which is not bad since he started very recently and has only gone firm this week due to the complete lack of visibility of EUkip in the constituency and in the belief shown in his letter above that EUkip has completely lost its way and is now self serving and self enriching for the few who have reahed the troughs.

Sadly in view of the obscene level of bullying and lies presented by the face of EUkip in public I believe that EUkip has a steadily collapsing future acting as useful idiots for the EU as it helps them build Pan EU Political Parties and emasculates itself by the vile company it keeps sitting with Racists, Xenophobes, anti Jewish extremists who not only advocate violence but use it.


It is clear there are no levels of legalised depravity to which EUkip and its staff would not sink to gain their ends and seek to enrich  themselves at the expense of others.

Good luck Niall and I hope you show a lead for honest remaining members which they have the courage to follow.

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS - GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

LEAVE THE EU
to
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK 

  Except of Course in Sommerton And Frome

#Doc008B* - Richard SUCHORZEWSKI, RESIGNATION LETTER

#Doc008B* - Richard SUCHORZEWSKI, RESIGNATION LETTER

Richard Suchorzewski Resignation Letter

Dear Colleague,

It is with great sadness and after much consideration that I have today sent by eMail and Royal Mail to The Chairman of UKIP the following letter:

5 October 2006

Dear Chairman,

Please be so good as to accept, and post on UKIP.org, this my letter of resignation from The UK Independence Party.

It was a privilege to be elected Chairman of UKIP Wales and work to represent the members in restructuring and introducing an organisational structure for growth. I would like to thank, for their invaluable assistance, John Bufton as Regional Organiser and my hard working and supportive committee and members in Wales. I am pleased to have been able to help turn UKIP Wales around and put in place foundations for growth and success in the National Assembly Elections next May.

I was honoured to be elected by the membership to represent them on the NEC, where they believed I had specialist skills and experience to best represent their interests, to the benefit of UKIP and its primary cause.

When I stood for the leadership election I did so, on a ticket of Transparency, Integrity and Equality. These standards reflect my inner beliefs, as well as the moral, ethical and Christian principles upon which I have based my whole life. I knew there were significant problems with the Party, and also believed that the moral integrity of a number of people at the top left much to be desired.

It was my belief that should I be elected leader these problems could be resolved and the Party then could move forward together, on a firmer footing in probity and strength.

Nothing however prepared me for the scurrilous behaviour, defamatory comments and downright dishonesty of some of Nigel Farage’s & David Bannerman’s staff, supporters and members of the Press Office staff, in which they clearly colluded.

I was accused of having associations with the BNP – even when these scoundrels knew that my grandfather was murdered by the Nazis in a concentration camp and my Great Grandfather was discovered hanged by them from a lamp post near his home by my 14 year old Father. Further I am angry that UKIP’s leadership were happy to collude in this base and obscene slur, particularly in the light of the fact that I have been ‘courting’ a young woman from St Lucia for the last 2 years, she herself has been victimised by racial abuse.

I was accused of being a homosexual, despite no evidence of this, and my having been happily married for 14 years, a marriage which sadly ended in an amicable divorce and now subsequently I am courting the above mentioned lady.

I was accused of having ‘run up’ a company debt of £4millions in one of my businesses when these accusers knew that I had purchased the company with secured debts, that it had already accrued, amounting to £4millions of losses. My business is in the field of mergers and acquisitions, specialising in the purchase, development and sale of problematic companies. My critics in this area are either commercial illiterates or unarguably dishonest either of which reflects ill on the competence of the new leadership.

My local newspaper was contacted by an UKIP official and advised to look into some of these accusations – in order to attempt to taint my unblemished reputation.

Even friends within my own local Conservative Party have informed me that they were asked for ‘any dirt’ they had on me including my political, personal and business affairs.

This list shamefully goes on.

Despite all of this I was willing to forgive and forget. I called for Party unity behind the new leader Nigel Farage, regardless of how he had gained his new position. I hoped this would in some way result in a change of attitude.

Clearly it did NOT. Farage colluded with, and thus endorsed the scurrilous behaviour. He was not prepared for his staff to apologise for the BNP allegations as he felt that the issue ‘would go away’ – and he tried to justify the concern on the basis that a fellow NEC member David Abbott volunteered his support of my leadership candidacy. (David Abbott is the very man whom Farage and his secretary Douglas Denny introduced and actively supported to the NEC and only turned against when he supported my candidacy.)

Farage also claimed concern in that a Mr Andrew Edwards supported my leadership bid on an internet blog that he runs. I am to be tainted by this, even though I have never posted on his site, spoken to, nor communicated with the said person, who I am advised is NOT a member of UKIP.

Farage has also claimed that a long term associate of his, Greg Lance-Watkins is a supporter and associate of the BNP, of which I have seen no evidence – yet this seems to besmirch my reputation, as G.L-W. openly supported my candidacy, having stated, based on extensive personal dealings with Nigel Farage that “he was a good performer for UKIP but lacked either the probity or competence to lead UKIP.”

This logic that UKIP’s new leader has adopted if seriously applied, must call into question his own credentials, bearing in mind both his long term association with G.L-W. and that the BNP actually refused to stand against Farage, and supported, his candidacy at the Bromley by-election. Does this make Nigel a BNP supporter?

Rather than be magnanimous in victory and help the Party unite, Nigel and his clique overturned a perfectly legitimate democratic vote at the NEC which had elected Geoffrey Kingscott (a most honourable man) as Party Secretary, denying the Party of another person with integrity at the top, and placing his supporter the discredited Douglas Denny in the post.

A witch hunt has now commenced, seemingly with the aim to disingenuously massage MEP lists, with the disciplinary hearing of Peter Baker for daring to make public his committee’s majority voted opposition to Roger Knapman’s morally questionable exploitation and involvement in a Polish Workers import business run by his son.

Similarly Dennis Brookes a loyal and devoted supporter and Regional Organiser of UKIP would seem to have been victimised, for having the temerity not to object to his committee’s support of my candidacy, and this apparently has contributed to losing him his job. I have no doubt from Nigel’s discussion with me, subsequent to the election, that others too will suffer similar fates.

On policy issues, Nigel has made statements already, that make it clear to me, we are to become a shadow alternative Tory Party. A pressure group created to persuade the Tories to dump Cameron and change its policy on the EU. I am sorry; I did not leave the real Tory party to join a poor imitation.

I believed UKIP was sincere in its endeavour to extricate Britain from the European Union, returning sovereignty to a British Parliament and playing a full independent part in that new Parliament.

On financial and transparency issues, I believe a cloud still overhangs the Ashford call centre and various aspects of UKIP accounts. Also the financial dealings and involvement in fraud, (as exposed by the media), of Tom Wise, one of UKIP’s MEP’s, have not adequately been resolved.

Likewise there has been a lack of transparency of others. I have contended that funding mechanisms are too heavily reliant on the EU, as this makes us subservient to the very body from which we wish to disassociate and which we openly accuse of corruption particularly in the area of accounting!.

I stood for leader knowing full well that it was a challenge I was unlikely to win. Farage had control of a number of advantages that if abused would guarantee him success. Knowing this, I was more than surprised that he allowed his cronies, supporters and certain staff to openly and reprehensibly lie and rubbish a loyal UKIP member, with elected duties, who devoted the last 2 years of his life, full time, unpaid, to help UKIP progress.

Even now in ‘victory’, Farage appears determined not to change his ways, and because of this I cannot support this Party under his leadership any longer.

Reluctantly I am left with no honourable action open to me other than leave, as I am not prepared to give my good name, reputation and integrity in support of Farage and many in his clique. I therefore stand alongside other Party devotees and former NEC members, Anthony Butcher, Gill Chant and others (not to mention the many activists who have already resigned).

My heart and my grateful thanks go out to all of those who supported me and the values in which we believed, and those who have committed so much of their lives in their patriotic pursuit of regaining democracy, British Independence and Sovereignty.

It does not give me any satisfaction to realise that the old saying “Fish Rots from the Head Down” may have more than a cursory resemblance to UKIP.

Please be so good as to convey to the membership my very best wishes and thanks for allowing me to serve them! At the moment I feel honour bound to continue the struggle for liberation from the EU and better Governance outside of UKIP, but would be happy to reconsider my position should there be notable changes within UKIP in the future under very different leadership.

Yours Sincerely,

Richard Suchorzewski UKIP Wales Chairman (resigned 5th Oct 2006) NEC Member (resigned 5th Oct 2006).

#Doc007 - Crown vs. WISE & JENKINS - Evidence, Documents (some)

#Doc007 - Crown vs. WISE & JENKINS - Evidence, Documents (some)

Here are some of the documents pertaining to:

DOUBLE CLICK

Any of the Documents

to view a larger version.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tom WISE on the third day

of the Crown's case
changed his plea to guilty.

After consultation he accepted

responsibility for Lindsey JENKINS'

complicity in the case.
The case against Lindsey JENKINS

was therefore fortuitously dropped.
Tom WISE

was sentenced to 2 Years in prison
&

a contribution of £30,000
towards Crown Costs.
I presume he funded his own
attempt at defence.

I was not entirely displease to receive this letter after the trial and conviction of Tom Wise but I am well aware of Michael Nattrass' publicly made claim that EUkip NEC would do nothing and his obscenity strewn comment when at the NEC he said 'How the F*** do you think we fund the party - we all do it'
I must admit I do not believe he was aware that Wise had used £6,000 of the money he had stolen to buy a Green Peugeot, nor paid a Wicks account from the stolen money and had paid off his credit cards with the money he had stolen.

Nigel Farage on the other hand did know having discussed it with Robin Collet, David Lott & Petrina Holdsworth. Subsequently Farage had arrangements made that Tom Wise would use about £5,000 of the money he had stolen to settle one of his own (FARAGE'S) personal debts. To the best of my knowledge Farage never paid back this stolen money he had wittingly derived the benefit of!

It will also be of interest that besides Michael Nattrass widely proclaiming Tom WISE had done nothing wrong and that they were all at it - I note some time later he started hedging his bets with comments like 'I believe a man is innocent until proven guilty' - that is legally no defence for colluding in the cover-up of a crime. A point that neither Trevor Colman nor Roger Knapman were prepared to abide by - it does seem Honesty in even the most basic form is a rare commodity in EUkip as Trevor Colman (Now an MEP seemingly in return) colluded in the crime by carrying out a corrupted enquiry and suppressing the investigation and his stated belief that both Tom Wise and Lindsay Jenkins were guilty of the crime.

Knapman & Colman colluded in Tom Wise's criminality by orchestrating a cover-up as did Robin Collet, Nigel Farage, David Lott and others. Petrina Holdsworth refused to collude in the cover-up and was forced by Mike Nattrass in collusion with Rioger Knapman to resign as Chairman of EUkip.

The efforts of Mark Croucher to smear Petrina Holdsworth with the claim that she had demanded a cut of the money for her silence failed miserably!

Here is the letter from Bedfordshire Constabulary:

I am aware that the utterly dishonest Peter REEVE has tried to claim he was involved in the reporting of the crime - this of course is patently untrue and can be established as a deliberate lie with even the briefest glance at the facts which show he was not even in EUkip in the region and would have known nothing of the matter at the time - I believe he was working in a supermarket some considerable distance away - but I doubt anyone would be surprised that he would lie to aggrandise himself.

FOR THE RECORD:
You are welcome to link to this page.

IF you wish to copy the documents

you are requested to provide details of source 

and publish the whole page with the same conditions pertaining.
Thank You.
Contact Details CLICK HERE

For more factual background CLICK HERE

Also this article is interesting as we are aware that Trevor Colman actively aided a cover-up of Tom Wise's criminality by prostituting his Queen's Commission as a Senior Police Officer Retired in an inquiry he dishonourably permitted his employers and others to stifle.


The article apeared in a pro UKIP leadership blog designed to defame smaear and lie about critics of the leadership of UKIP - this was their posting:
 

Saturday, 1 November 2008

Trevor Colman and foot in mouth disease

Much talk on Democracy Forum about TC and an alleged smear campaign against him claiming he made racist comments. Maybe, maybe not. It wouldn't be the first time in his short career as an MEP.


News reaches us that at his welcoming meeting in Strasbourg he was enjoying a chat with a fellow attendee, telling them how much he hated Farage, and how in his days as a copper they knew how to deal with troublesome journalists who took too much of an interest in such boring issues as police corruption - lock them in a cell with a couple of burly PCs, and then beat the crap out of them. Medecine to be repeated daily until cured. Other such indiscretions tumbled from his lips, leaving a bemused European Editor of a national daily, for such was his audience, wishing it had not been a private meeting because it would have made a lovely front page.


Not the first time such comments have been made by TC, however. Another source tells the Common Man that he thought this would have been an ideal way of dealing with Tom Wise, who he cleared, then smeared, then cleared again shortly before Wise's arrest.


With friends like this to show UKIP's best face to the media, who needs enemies?

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&

Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to

Reclaim YOUR Future 

&

GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

(IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate) .

LEAVE-THE-EU

to Reclaim YOUR Future 

&

GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01291 - 62 65 62

of: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

on: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com

 Please Be Sure To

Tweet

My Blogs 

To Spread The Facts World Wide

of

OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU  

#Doc007* - ELYSEE, The TREATY of

#Doc007* - ELYSEE, The TREATY of

Joint Declaration

General de Gaulle,
President of the French Republic,
and
Dr Konrad Adenauer,
Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany,

Following the conference which was held in Paris on 21st and 22nd January 1963, and at which were present, on the French side, the Prime Minister, the Foreign Minister, the Armed Forces Minister and the Minister of Education;
on the German side, the Foreign Minister, the Defence Minister and the Minister of Family and Youth;

Convinced that the reconciliation of the German people and the French people, ending a centuries-old rivalry, constitutes an historic event which profoundly transforms the relations between the two peoples,
Aware of the solidarity uniting the two peoples, as much from the point of view of their security as from the point of view of their economic and cultural development,
Noting in particular that youth has recognised this solidarity and is called upon to play a decisive role in the consolidation of Franco-German friendship,
Recognising that a reinforcing of cooperation between the two countries constitutes an indispensable stage on the way to a united Europe, which is the aim of the two peoples:

Have given their agreement to the organisation and principles of cooperation between the two States such as they are set out in the Treaty signed this day.

The Treaty

Following the joint declaration of the President of the French Republic and the Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany, dated 22nd January 1963, on the organisation and principles of cooperation between the two States, the following arrangements have been agreed to:

I - ORGANISATION

1. The Heads of State and Government will give the necessary directives in accordance with needs and will follow regularly the application of the programme fixed hereafter.
They will meet to this effect each time this will be necessary and, in principle, at least twice a year.


2. The Foreign Ministers will supervise the execution of the programme as a whole.
They will meet at least every three months.
Without prejudicing contacts normally established through embassies, high officials of the two Foreign Ministries charged respectively with political, economic and cultural affairs will meet each month alternatively in Paris and in Bonn to assess current problems and to prepare the meeting of Ministers.
On the other hand, the diplomatic missions and the consulates of the two countries, as well as their permanent representation at international organisations, will make all contacts necessary on problems of common interest.


3. Regular meetings will take place between the responsible authorities of the two countries in the fields of defence, education and youth. They will in no way affect the functioning of already existing organisms -- the Franco-German Cultural Commission and the Permanent Staff Group -- whose activities will, on the contrary, be developed.
The Foreign Ministers will be represented at these meetings to ensure the overall coordination of cooperation.

(a) The Armed Forces or Defence Ministers will meet at least once every three months. Likewise, the French Minister of Education will meet according to the same rhythm, the individual who will be designated on the German side, to follow the programme of cooperation.

(b) The Chiefs of Staff of the two countries will meet at least once every two months. Should they be unable to attend, they will be replaced by their responsible representatives.

(c) The French High Commissioner for Youth and Sports will meet, at least once every two months, the Federal Minister of Family and Youth or his representative.


4. In each of the two countries an inter-ministerial commission will be charged with following the problems of cooperation.
It will be presided over by a high official of the Foreign Ministries and will include representatives of all the interested administrations.
Its role will be to coordinate the action of the interested ministries and to make periodically a report to its government on the state of Franco-German cooperation.
It will also have the task of presenting all useful suggestions with a view to the execution of the programme and its extension to new fields.


II - PROGRAMME


Foreign Affairs


1. The two Governments will consult before any decision on all important questions of foreign policy and, in the first place, on questions of common interest, with a view to reaching as far as possible an analogous position.
This consultation will bear among others on the following subjects:

° Problems relating to the European Communities and to European political cooperation;

° East-West relations both on the political and the economic planes;

° Matters dealt with within the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation and the various international organisations in which the two Governments are interested, notably the Council of Europe, the Western European Union, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, the United Nations and its specialised institutions.


2. The collaboration already established in the field of information will be continued and developed between the interested services in Paris and Bonn and between missions in third countries.


3. With regard to aid to developing countries, the two Governments will systematically compare their programmes with a view to maintaining close coordination.
They will study the possibility of undertaking joint projects.
Several ministerial departments being competent for these questions, on the French side as on the German side, it will be for the two Foreign Ministers to determine together the practical bases of this collaboration.


4. The two Governments will study jointly the means of reinforcing their cooperation in other important sectors of economic policy, such as agricultural and forestry policy, energy, the problems of communications and transport and industrial development, within the framework of the Common Market, as well as the policy of export credits.


Defence


I. The aims pursued in this field will be the following:


1. In the field of strategy and tactics, the competent authorities of the two countries will endeavour to bring their doctrines closer together with a view to reaching common conceptions. Franco-German institutes of operational research will be set up.


2. Exchanges of personnel between the armies will be increased.
They will concern in particular instructors and students of the general staff colleges.
They can include the temporary detachment of entire units.
In order to facilitate these exchanges, an effort will be made by both sides with a view to the practical teaching of the languages of the trainees.


3. With regard to armaments, the two Governments will endeavour to organise work in common from the stage of drawing up appropriate armaments plans and of the preparation of plans for financing them.
To this end, mixed commissions will study current researches on these plans in the two countries and will present proposals to the ministries who will examine them at their quarterly meetings and will give the necessary directives for application.


II. The governments will institute a study of the conditions in which Franco-German collaboration can be established in the field of defence.


Education and Youth


As regards education and youth, the proposals contained in the French and German memoranda of 19th September and 8th November 1962, will be studied on the lines set out above.


1. In the field of education, efforts will be concentrated mainly on the following points:

(a) Language teaching:
The two Governments recognise the vital importance that knowledge of each other's language in each of the two countries holds for Franco-German cooperation.
They will strive, with this aim in mind, to take concrete steps to increase the number of German schoolchildren learning French and the number of French schoolchildren learning German.
The Federal Government will examine with the Governments of the Lander (states) who are responsible in this sphere, the possibility of introducing a system which will permit achievement of this aim.
In all establishments of higher learning it will be of advantage to arrange practical instruction of the French language in Germany and of the German language in France, open to all students.

(b) Problems of equivalences:
The competent authorities in both countries will be asked to speed up the adoption of arrangements ensuring that terms of study, examinations, university awards and diplomas correspond.

(c) Cooperation on scientific research:
Research organisations and scientific institutions will develop their contacts beginning with the fullest possible exchange of information.
Coordinated research programmes will be set up in disciplines where this is feasible.


2. Young people in the two countries will be given every opportunity to strengthen the bonds which link them and to increase mutual cooperation. In particular, collective exchanges will be increased.
A body for developing these opportunities and promoting the exchanges will be set up by the two countries with a single administrative council in charge.
This organisation will have at its disposal a joint Franco-German fund to be used for exchanges between the two countries, of school children, students, young artisans and workers.


III - FINAL ARRANGEMENTS


1. The necessary directives will be issued in each country to implement immediately everything mentioned above.


2. The two Governments will keep member Governments of the European Communities informed of the development of Franco-German cooperation.


3. Apart from those clauses covering defence, the present Treaty will also apply to the Berlin Land (state) unless a declaration to the contrary is made by the Government of the German Federal Republic to the Government of the French Republic in the course of the three months following the entry into force of the present Treaty.


4. The two Governments can make those arrangements which appear necessary for the implementation of the present Treaty.


5. The present Treaty will enter into force as soon as each of the two Governments has informed the other that the conditions necessary for this in either country have been fulfilled.

Drawn up in Paris, on 22nd January 1963, in two copies, in French and German, both texts being equally valid.

The Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany
Adenauer

The Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Federal Republic of Germany
Schröder

The President of the French Republic
C. de Gaulle

The French Prime Minister
Pompidou

The French Foreign Minister
M. Couve de Murville

from: The German Archeive

Regards,
Greg L-W.
[to Reply: Greg@GlanceBack.Demon.co.UK other addresses are auto spam filtered]

http://GregLanceWatkins.blogspot.com
for my contact details, blogs & views

We must work together to liberate these United Kingdoms from the undemocratic, corrupt, centralised, unaccountable and allien EUropean Union, which has been so damaging to Britain both in cost and destruction of our values, industry, commerce, governance, defence, British Justice, Commonwealth, borders & the Anglosphere.

No trustworthy politician has EVER provided a single solitary benefit of membership of The EU which justifies the £1.8 Million / Hour cost or loss of self determination and foreign or trade policy.

We All Know the benefits for politicians of the feeding troughs on The EU Gravy Train and the corruption at Westminster, where MPs & Peers are not required to declare the identity of their EU paymasters when they debate or vote!

#Doc006* - THE SHAME of EFD!

#Doc006* - THE SHAME of EFD!

In their efforts to create pan EU political parties groups and MEPs are bribed to form these parties by the payment of additional funding and various perks such as chauffeurs, limos and other pretentious rewards. Including the delusion that there is added value in speaking for longer in the largely, if not wholly, ignored EU pretend parliament where one is bribed to attend to vote in a meaningless manner - this is, together with a budget of €850 Million squandered on propaganda, a part of an elaborate structure to pretend the EU is in some way democratic when increasingly the people are realising it is a corrupt, undemocratic, communist styled centralised committee dictatorship.

If you have ANY doubt of the veracity of the above statement study the details of the self styled EFD and it is clear that without exception they are vile!

Read the Official Declaration below and try very hard not to upchuck at its pure hypocrisy and risible tautology! Be minded that this is a pro EU party group!

EUROPE of FREEDOM and DEMOCRACY
The Group Political Platform

The Group is open to Members that subscribe to a Europe of Freedom and Democracy and acknowledge the United Nations Declaration on Human Rights and parliamentary democracy.

The Group subscribes to the following programme:

1. Freedom and co-operation among people of different States
Committed to the principles of democracy, freedom and co-operation among Nation States, the Group favours an open, transparent, democratic and accountable co-operation among sovereign European States and rejects the bureaucratisation of Europe and the creation of a single centralised European superstate.

2. More democracy and respect of People’s will
Convinced that the legitimate level for democracy lies with the Nation States, their regions and parliaments since there is no such thing as a single European people; the Group opposes further European integration (treaties and policies) that would exacerbate the present democratic deficit and the centralist political structure of the EU. The Group favours that any new treaties or any modification of the existing treaties are to be submitted to the peoples’ vote through free and fair national referenda in the Member States. The Group does believe that the legitimacy of any power comes from the will of its Peoples and their right to be free and democratically ruled.

3. Respect for Europe’s history, traditions and cultural values
Peoples and Nations of Europe have the right to protect their borders and strengthen their own historical, traditional, cultural and religious values. The Group rejects xenophobia, anti-Semitism and any other form of discrimination.

4. Respect for national differences and interests: Freedom of votes
Agreeing on embodying these principles in its proceedings, the Group respects the freedom of its delegations and Members to vote as they see fit.

Brussels, 1st July 2009

#Doc005* - EUkip ACCOUNTS 2008

#Doc005* - EUkip ACCOUNTS 2008

To View EUkip's ACCOUNTS

for 2008

CLICK HERE

"In politics, stupidity is not a handicap."
Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821),

Regards,
Greg L-W.

for all my contact details & Blogs:
CLICK HERE

For More Information & Facts visit:
WEB SITES:
SilentMajority/
WelshAssembly

‘The arrogance and hubris of corrupt politicians
will be responsible for every drop of blood spilt
in the Wars of Disassociation, if Britain does not
leave the EU.

The ugly, centralised, undemocratic supra national policies being imposed by the centralised and largely unelected decisionmakers of The EU for alien aims, ailien values and to suit alien needs stand every possibility of creating 200,000,000 deaths across EUrope as a result of the blind arrogance and hubris of the idiologues in the central dictatorship, and their economic illiteracy marching hand in glove with the idiocy of The CAP & The CFP - both policies which deliver bills, destroy lives and denude food stocks.

The EU, due to the political idiocy and corruption of its undemocratic leaders, is now a net importer of food, no longer able to feed itself and with a decreasing range of over priced goods of little use to the rest of the world to sell with which to counter the net financial drain of endless imports.

British Politicians with pens and treachery, in pursuit
of their own agenda and greed, have done more
damage to the liberty, freedoms, rights and democracy
of the British peoples than any army in over 1,000 years.

The disastrous effects of British politicians selling Britain
into the thrall of foreign rule by the EU for their own
personal rewards has damaged the well-being of Britain
more than the armies of Hitler
and the Franco - German - Italian axis of 1939 - 1945.

~ for more Quotes & Facts:
http://www.silentmajority.co.uk/

############-\\\///-###########
#############= ~ = ############
###########(`~0~0~') ##########
----------oooO--------(_)-------Oooo---------
############Regards###########
##########M r C H A D##########

Until we gain our liberty, restore our sovereignty, repatriate our democracy and reinstate our Justice system and our borders - defended by our Police and Military armed with sustainable and obtainable weaponry:
Treat every election as a referendum.

Don't waste your vote on a self serving Politician in ANY election until we are liberated from the EU and are a Free Sovereign peoples, with independent control of our own borders, making and managing Law & Justice for our own benefit, in our own elected Westminster Parliament where we can fire our politicians at the ballot box, if they fail to represent OUR best interests.
Make your vote count
Write on YOUR ballot Paper
LEAVE THE EU