#Doc008B* - Richard SUCHORZEWSKI, RESIGNATION LETTER

#Doc008B* - Richard SUCHORZEWSKI, RESIGNATION LETTER

Richard Suchorzewski Resignation Letter

Dear Colleague,

It is with great sadness and after much consideration that I have today sent by eMail and Royal Mail to The Chairman of UKIP the following letter:

5 October 2006

Dear Chairman,

Please be so good as to accept, and post on UKIP.org, this my letter of resignation from The UK Independence Party.

It was a privilege to be elected Chairman of UKIP Wales and work to represent the members in restructuring and introducing an organisational structure for growth. I would like to thank, for their invaluable assistance, John Bufton as Regional Organiser and my hard working and supportive committee and members in Wales. I am pleased to have been able to help turn UKIP Wales around and put in place foundations for growth and success in the National Assembly Elections next May.

I was honoured to be elected by the membership to represent them on the NEC, where they believed I had specialist skills and experience to best represent their interests, to the benefit of UKIP and its primary cause.

When I stood for the leadership election I did so, on a ticket of Transparency, Integrity and Equality. These standards reflect my inner beliefs, as well as the moral, ethical and Christian principles upon which I have based my whole life. I knew there were significant problems with the Party, and also believed that the moral integrity of a number of people at the top left much to be desired.

It was my belief that should I be elected leader these problems could be resolved and the Party then could move forward together, on a firmer footing in probity and strength.

Nothing however prepared me for the scurrilous behaviour, defamatory comments and downright dishonesty of some of Nigel Farage’s & David Bannerman’s staff, supporters and members of the Press Office staff, in which they clearly colluded.

I was accused of having associations with the BNP – even when these scoundrels knew that my grandfather was murdered by the Nazis in a concentration camp and my Great Grandfather was discovered hanged by them from a lamp post near his home by my 14 year old Father. Further I am angry that UKIP’s leadership were happy to collude in this base and obscene slur, particularly in the light of the fact that I have been ‘courting’ a young woman from St Lucia for the last 2 years, she herself has been victimised by racial abuse.

I was accused of being a homosexual, despite no evidence of this, and my having been happily married for 14 years, a marriage which sadly ended in an amicable divorce and now subsequently I am courting the above mentioned lady.

I was accused of having ‘run up’ a company debt of £4millions in one of my businesses when these accusers knew that I had purchased the company with secured debts, that it had already accrued, amounting to £4millions of losses. My business is in the field of mergers and acquisitions, specialising in the purchase, development and sale of problematic companies. My critics in this area are either commercial illiterates or unarguably dishonest either of which reflects ill on the competence of the new leadership.

My local newspaper was contacted by an UKIP official and advised to look into some of these accusations – in order to attempt to taint my unblemished reputation.

Even friends within my own local Conservative Party have informed me that they were asked for ‘any dirt’ they had on me including my political, personal and business affairs.

This list shamefully goes on.

Despite all of this I was willing to forgive and forget. I called for Party unity behind the new leader Nigel Farage, regardless of how he had gained his new position. I hoped this would in some way result in a change of attitude.

Clearly it did NOT. Farage colluded with, and thus endorsed the scurrilous behaviour. He was not prepared for his staff to apologise for the BNP allegations as he felt that the issue ‘would go away’ – and he tried to justify the concern on the basis that a fellow NEC member David Abbott volunteered his support of my leadership candidacy. (David Abbott is the very man whom Farage and his secretary Douglas Denny introduced and actively supported to the NEC and only turned against when he supported my candidacy.)

Farage also claimed concern in that a Mr Andrew Edwards supported my leadership bid on an internet blog that he runs. I am to be tainted by this, even though I have never posted on his site, spoken to, nor communicated with the said person, who I am advised is NOT a member of UKIP.

Farage has also claimed that a long term associate of his, Greg Lance-Watkins is a supporter and associate of the BNP, of which I have seen no evidence – yet this seems to besmirch my reputation, as G.L-W. openly supported my candidacy, having stated, based on extensive personal dealings with Nigel Farage that “he was a good performer for UKIP but lacked either the probity or competence to lead UKIP.”

This logic that UKIP’s new leader has adopted if seriously applied, must call into question his own credentials, bearing in mind both his long term association with G.L-W. and that the BNP actually refused to stand against Farage, and supported, his candidacy at the Bromley by-election. Does this make Nigel a BNP supporter?

Rather than be magnanimous in victory and help the Party unite, Nigel and his clique overturned a perfectly legitimate democratic vote at the NEC which had elected Geoffrey Kingscott (a most honourable man) as Party Secretary, denying the Party of another person with integrity at the top, and placing his supporter the discredited Douglas Denny in the post.

A witch hunt has now commenced, seemingly with the aim to disingenuously massage MEP lists, with the disciplinary hearing of Peter Baker for daring to make public his committee’s majority voted opposition to Roger Knapman’s morally questionable exploitation and involvement in a Polish Workers import business run by his son.

Similarly Dennis Brookes a loyal and devoted supporter and Regional Organiser of UKIP would seem to have been victimised, for having the temerity not to object to his committee’s support of my candidacy, and this apparently has contributed to losing him his job. I have no doubt from Nigel’s discussion with me, subsequent to the election, that others too will suffer similar fates.

On policy issues, Nigel has made statements already, that make it clear to me, we are to become a shadow alternative Tory Party. A pressure group created to persuade the Tories to dump Cameron and change its policy on the EU. I am sorry; I did not leave the real Tory party to join a poor imitation.

I believed UKIP was sincere in its endeavour to extricate Britain from the European Union, returning sovereignty to a British Parliament and playing a full independent part in that new Parliament.

On financial and transparency issues, I believe a cloud still overhangs the Ashford call centre and various aspects of UKIP accounts. Also the financial dealings and involvement in fraud, (as exposed by the media), of Tom Wise, one of UKIP’s MEP’s, have not adequately been resolved.

Likewise there has been a lack of transparency of others. I have contended that funding mechanisms are too heavily reliant on the EU, as this makes us subservient to the very body from which we wish to disassociate and which we openly accuse of corruption particularly in the area of accounting!.

I stood for leader knowing full well that it was a challenge I was unlikely to win. Farage had control of a number of advantages that if abused would guarantee him success. Knowing this, I was more than surprised that he allowed his cronies, supporters and certain staff to openly and reprehensibly lie and rubbish a loyal UKIP member, with elected duties, who devoted the last 2 years of his life, full time, unpaid, to help UKIP progress.

Even now in ‘victory’, Farage appears determined not to change his ways, and because of this I cannot support this Party under his leadership any longer.

Reluctantly I am left with no honourable action open to me other than leave, as I am not prepared to give my good name, reputation and integrity in support of Farage and many in his clique. I therefore stand alongside other Party devotees and former NEC members, Anthony Butcher, Gill Chant and others (not to mention the many activists who have already resigned).

My heart and my grateful thanks go out to all of those who supported me and the values in which we believed, and those who have committed so much of their lives in their patriotic pursuit of regaining democracy, British Independence and Sovereignty.

It does not give me any satisfaction to realise that the old saying “Fish Rots from the Head Down” may have more than a cursory resemblance to UKIP.

Please be so good as to convey to the membership my very best wishes and thanks for allowing me to serve them! At the moment I feel honour bound to continue the struggle for liberation from the EU and better Governance outside of UKIP, but would be happy to reconsider my position should there be notable changes within UKIP in the future under very different leadership.

Yours Sincerely,

Richard Suchorzewski UKIP Wales Chairman (resigned 5th Oct 2006) NEC Member (resigned 5th Oct 2006).

#Doc007 - Crown vs. WISE & JENKINS - Evidence, Documents (some)

#Doc007 - Crown vs. WISE & JENKINS - Evidence, Documents (some)

Here are some of the documents pertaining to:

DOUBLE CLICK

Any of the Documents

to view a larger version.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tom WISE on the third day

of the Crown's case
changed his plea to guilty.

After consultation he accepted

responsibility for Lindsey JENKINS'

complicity in the case.
The case against Lindsey JENKINS

was therefore fortuitously dropped.
Tom WISE

was sentenced to 2 Years in prison
&

a contribution of £30,000
towards Crown Costs.
I presume he funded his own
attempt at defence.

I was not entirely displease to receive this letter after the trial and conviction of Tom Wise but I am well aware of Michael Nattrass' publicly made claim that EUkip NEC would do nothing and his obscenity strewn comment when at the NEC he said 'How the F*** do you think we fund the party - we all do it'
I must admit I do not believe he was aware that Wise had used £6,000 of the money he had stolen to buy a Green Peugeot, nor paid a Wicks account from the stolen money and had paid off his credit cards with the money he had stolen.

Nigel Farage on the other hand did know having discussed it with Robin Collet, David Lott & Petrina Holdsworth. Subsequently Farage had arrangements made that Tom Wise would use about £5,000 of the money he had stolen to settle one of his own (FARAGE'S) personal debts. To the best of my knowledge Farage never paid back this stolen money he had wittingly derived the benefit of!

It will also be of interest that besides Michael Nattrass widely proclaiming Tom WISE had done nothing wrong and that they were all at it - I note some time later he started hedging his bets with comments like 'I believe a man is innocent until proven guilty' - that is legally no defence for colluding in the cover-up of a crime. A point that neither Trevor Colman nor Roger Knapman were prepared to abide by - it does seem Honesty in even the most basic form is a rare commodity in EUkip as Trevor Colman (Now an MEP seemingly in return) colluded in the crime by carrying out a corrupted enquiry and suppressing the investigation and his stated belief that both Tom Wise and Lindsay Jenkins were guilty of the crime.

Knapman & Colman colluded in Tom Wise's criminality by orchestrating a cover-up as did Robin Collet, Nigel Farage, David Lott and others. Petrina Holdsworth refused to collude in the cover-up and was forced by Mike Nattrass in collusion with Rioger Knapman to resign as Chairman of EUkip.

The efforts of Mark Croucher to smear Petrina Holdsworth with the claim that she had demanded a cut of the money for her silence failed miserably!

Here is the letter from Bedfordshire Constabulary:

I am aware that the utterly dishonest Peter REEVE has tried to claim he was involved in the reporting of the crime - this of course is patently untrue and can be established as a deliberate lie with even the briefest glance at the facts which show he was not even in EUkip in the region and would have known nothing of the matter at the time - I believe he was working in a supermarket some considerable distance away - but I doubt anyone would be surprised that he would lie to aggrandise himself.

FOR THE RECORD:
You are welcome to link to this page.

IF you wish to copy the documents

you are requested to provide details of source 

and publish the whole page with the same conditions pertaining.
Thank You.
Contact Details CLICK HERE

For more factual background CLICK HERE

Also this article is interesting as we are aware that Trevor Colman actively aided a cover-up of Tom Wise's criminality by prostituting his Queen's Commission as a Senior Police Officer Retired in an inquiry he dishonourably permitted his employers and others to stifle.


The article apeared in a pro UKIP leadership blog designed to defame smaear and lie about critics of the leadership of UKIP - this was their posting:
 

Saturday, 1 November 2008

Trevor Colman and foot in mouth disease

Much talk on Democracy Forum about TC and an alleged smear campaign against him claiming he made racist comments. Maybe, maybe not. It wouldn't be the first time in his short career as an MEP.


News reaches us that at his welcoming meeting in Strasbourg he was enjoying a chat with a fellow attendee, telling them how much he hated Farage, and how in his days as a copper they knew how to deal with troublesome journalists who took too much of an interest in such boring issues as police corruption - lock them in a cell with a couple of burly PCs, and then beat the crap out of them. Medecine to be repeated daily until cured. Other such indiscretions tumbled from his lips, leaving a bemused European Editor of a national daily, for such was his audience, wishing it had not been a private meeting because it would have made a lovely front page.


Not the first time such comments have been made by TC, however. Another source tells the Common Man that he thought this would have been an ideal way of dealing with Tom Wise, who he cleared, then smeared, then cleared again shortly before Wise's arrest.


With friends like this to show UKIP's best face to the media, who needs enemies?

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&

Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to

Reclaim YOUR Future 

&

GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

(IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate) .

LEAVE-THE-EU

to Reclaim YOUR Future 

&

GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01291 - 62 65 62

of: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

on: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com

 Please Be Sure To

Tweet

My Blogs 

To Spread The Facts World Wide

of

OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU  

#Doc007* - ELYSEE, The TREATY of

#Doc007* - ELYSEE, The TREATY of

Joint Declaration

General de Gaulle,
President of the French Republic,
and
Dr Konrad Adenauer,
Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany,

Following the conference which was held in Paris on 21st and 22nd January 1963, and at which were present, on the French side, the Prime Minister, the Foreign Minister, the Armed Forces Minister and the Minister of Education;
on the German side, the Foreign Minister, the Defence Minister and the Minister of Family and Youth;

Convinced that the reconciliation of the German people and the French people, ending a centuries-old rivalry, constitutes an historic event which profoundly transforms the relations between the two peoples,
Aware of the solidarity uniting the two peoples, as much from the point of view of their security as from the point of view of their economic and cultural development,
Noting in particular that youth has recognised this solidarity and is called upon to play a decisive role in the consolidation of Franco-German friendship,
Recognising that a reinforcing of cooperation between the two countries constitutes an indispensable stage on the way to a united Europe, which is the aim of the two peoples:

Have given their agreement to the organisation and principles of cooperation between the two States such as they are set out in the Treaty signed this day.

The Treaty

Following the joint declaration of the President of the French Republic and the Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany, dated 22nd January 1963, on the organisation and principles of cooperation between the two States, the following arrangements have been agreed to:

I - ORGANISATION

1. The Heads of State and Government will give the necessary directives in accordance with needs and will follow regularly the application of the programme fixed hereafter.
They will meet to this effect each time this will be necessary and, in principle, at least twice a year.


2. The Foreign Ministers will supervise the execution of the programme as a whole.
They will meet at least every three months.
Without prejudicing contacts normally established through embassies, high officials of the two Foreign Ministries charged respectively with political, economic and cultural affairs will meet each month alternatively in Paris and in Bonn to assess current problems and to prepare the meeting of Ministers.
On the other hand, the diplomatic missions and the consulates of the two countries, as well as their permanent representation at international organisations, will make all contacts necessary on problems of common interest.


3. Regular meetings will take place between the responsible authorities of the two countries in the fields of defence, education and youth. They will in no way affect the functioning of already existing organisms -- the Franco-German Cultural Commission and the Permanent Staff Group -- whose activities will, on the contrary, be developed.
The Foreign Ministers will be represented at these meetings to ensure the overall coordination of cooperation.

(a) The Armed Forces or Defence Ministers will meet at least once every three months. Likewise, the French Minister of Education will meet according to the same rhythm, the individual who will be designated on the German side, to follow the programme of cooperation.

(b) The Chiefs of Staff of the two countries will meet at least once every two months. Should they be unable to attend, they will be replaced by their responsible representatives.

(c) The French High Commissioner for Youth and Sports will meet, at least once every two months, the Federal Minister of Family and Youth or his representative.


4. In each of the two countries an inter-ministerial commission will be charged with following the problems of cooperation.
It will be presided over by a high official of the Foreign Ministries and will include representatives of all the interested administrations.
Its role will be to coordinate the action of the interested ministries and to make periodically a report to its government on the state of Franco-German cooperation.
It will also have the task of presenting all useful suggestions with a view to the execution of the programme and its extension to new fields.


II - PROGRAMME


Foreign Affairs


1. The two Governments will consult before any decision on all important questions of foreign policy and, in the first place, on questions of common interest, with a view to reaching as far as possible an analogous position.
This consultation will bear among others on the following subjects:

° Problems relating to the European Communities and to European political cooperation;

° East-West relations both on the political and the economic planes;

° Matters dealt with within the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation and the various international organisations in which the two Governments are interested, notably the Council of Europe, the Western European Union, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, the United Nations and its specialised institutions.


2. The collaboration already established in the field of information will be continued and developed between the interested services in Paris and Bonn and between missions in third countries.


3. With regard to aid to developing countries, the two Governments will systematically compare their programmes with a view to maintaining close coordination.
They will study the possibility of undertaking joint projects.
Several ministerial departments being competent for these questions, on the French side as on the German side, it will be for the two Foreign Ministers to determine together the practical bases of this collaboration.


4. The two Governments will study jointly the means of reinforcing their cooperation in other important sectors of economic policy, such as agricultural and forestry policy, energy, the problems of communications and transport and industrial development, within the framework of the Common Market, as well as the policy of export credits.


Defence


I. The aims pursued in this field will be the following:


1. In the field of strategy and tactics, the competent authorities of the two countries will endeavour to bring their doctrines closer together with a view to reaching common conceptions. Franco-German institutes of operational research will be set up.


2. Exchanges of personnel between the armies will be increased.
They will concern in particular instructors and students of the general staff colleges.
They can include the temporary detachment of entire units.
In order to facilitate these exchanges, an effort will be made by both sides with a view to the practical teaching of the languages of the trainees.


3. With regard to armaments, the two Governments will endeavour to organise work in common from the stage of drawing up appropriate armaments plans and of the preparation of plans for financing them.
To this end, mixed commissions will study current researches on these plans in the two countries and will present proposals to the ministries who will examine them at their quarterly meetings and will give the necessary directives for application.


II. The governments will institute a study of the conditions in which Franco-German collaboration can be established in the field of defence.


Education and Youth


As regards education and youth, the proposals contained in the French and German memoranda of 19th September and 8th November 1962, will be studied on the lines set out above.


1. In the field of education, efforts will be concentrated mainly on the following points:

(a) Language teaching:
The two Governments recognise the vital importance that knowledge of each other's language in each of the two countries holds for Franco-German cooperation.
They will strive, with this aim in mind, to take concrete steps to increase the number of German schoolchildren learning French and the number of French schoolchildren learning German.
The Federal Government will examine with the Governments of the Lander (states) who are responsible in this sphere, the possibility of introducing a system which will permit achievement of this aim.
In all establishments of higher learning it will be of advantage to arrange practical instruction of the French language in Germany and of the German language in France, open to all students.

(b) Problems of equivalences:
The competent authorities in both countries will be asked to speed up the adoption of arrangements ensuring that terms of study, examinations, university awards and diplomas correspond.

(c) Cooperation on scientific research:
Research organisations and scientific institutions will develop their contacts beginning with the fullest possible exchange of information.
Coordinated research programmes will be set up in disciplines where this is feasible.


2. Young people in the two countries will be given every opportunity to strengthen the bonds which link them and to increase mutual cooperation. In particular, collective exchanges will be increased.
A body for developing these opportunities and promoting the exchanges will be set up by the two countries with a single administrative council in charge.
This organisation will have at its disposal a joint Franco-German fund to be used for exchanges between the two countries, of school children, students, young artisans and workers.


III - FINAL ARRANGEMENTS


1. The necessary directives will be issued in each country to implement immediately everything mentioned above.


2. The two Governments will keep member Governments of the European Communities informed of the development of Franco-German cooperation.


3. Apart from those clauses covering defence, the present Treaty will also apply to the Berlin Land (state) unless a declaration to the contrary is made by the Government of the German Federal Republic to the Government of the French Republic in the course of the three months following the entry into force of the present Treaty.


4. The two Governments can make those arrangements which appear necessary for the implementation of the present Treaty.


5. The present Treaty will enter into force as soon as each of the two Governments has informed the other that the conditions necessary for this in either country have been fulfilled.

Drawn up in Paris, on 22nd January 1963, in two copies, in French and German, both texts being equally valid.

The Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany
Adenauer

The Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Federal Republic of Germany
Schröder

The President of the French Republic
C. de Gaulle

The French Prime Minister
Pompidou

The French Foreign Minister
M. Couve de Murville

from: The German Archeive

Regards,
Greg L-W.
[to Reply: Greg@GlanceBack.Demon.co.UK other addresses are auto spam filtered]

http://GregLanceWatkins.blogspot.com
for my contact details, blogs & views

We must work together to liberate these United Kingdoms from the undemocratic, corrupt, centralised, unaccountable and allien EUropean Union, which has been so damaging to Britain both in cost and destruction of our values, industry, commerce, governance, defence, British Justice, Commonwealth, borders & the Anglosphere.

No trustworthy politician has EVER provided a single solitary benefit of membership of The EU which justifies the £1.8 Million / Hour cost or loss of self determination and foreign or trade policy.

We All Know the benefits for politicians of the feeding troughs on The EU Gravy Train and the corruption at Westminster, where MPs & Peers are not required to declare the identity of their EU paymasters when they debate or vote!

#Doc006* - THE SHAME of EFD!

#Doc006* - THE SHAME of EFD!

In their efforts to create pan EU political parties groups and MEPs are bribed to form these parties by the payment of additional funding and various perks such as chauffeurs, limos and other pretentious rewards. Including the delusion that there is added value in speaking for longer in the largely, if not wholly, ignored EU pretend parliament where one is bribed to attend to vote in a meaningless manner - this is, together with a budget of €850 Million squandered on propaganda, a part of an elaborate structure to pretend the EU is in some way democratic when increasingly the people are realising it is a corrupt, undemocratic, communist styled centralised committee dictatorship.

If you have ANY doubt of the veracity of the above statement study the details of the self styled EFD and it is clear that without exception they are vile!

Read the Official Declaration below and try very hard not to upchuck at its pure hypocrisy and risible tautology! Be minded that this is a pro EU party group!

EUROPE of FREEDOM and DEMOCRACY
The Group Political Platform

The Group is open to Members that subscribe to a Europe of Freedom and Democracy and acknowledge the United Nations Declaration on Human Rights and parliamentary democracy.

The Group subscribes to the following programme:

1. Freedom and co-operation among people of different States
Committed to the principles of democracy, freedom and co-operation among Nation States, the Group favours an open, transparent, democratic and accountable co-operation among sovereign European States and rejects the bureaucratisation of Europe and the creation of a single centralised European superstate.

2. More democracy and respect of People’s will
Convinced that the legitimate level for democracy lies with the Nation States, their regions and parliaments since there is no such thing as a single European people; the Group opposes further European integration (treaties and policies) that would exacerbate the present democratic deficit and the centralist political structure of the EU. The Group favours that any new treaties or any modification of the existing treaties are to be submitted to the peoples’ vote through free and fair national referenda in the Member States. The Group does believe that the legitimacy of any power comes from the will of its Peoples and their right to be free and democratically ruled.

3. Respect for Europe’s history, traditions and cultural values
Peoples and Nations of Europe have the right to protect their borders and strengthen their own historical, traditional, cultural and religious values. The Group rejects xenophobia, anti-Semitism and any other form of discrimination.

4. Respect for national differences and interests: Freedom of votes
Agreeing on embodying these principles in its proceedings, the Group respects the freedom of its delegations and Members to vote as they see fit.

Brussels, 1st July 2009

#Doc005* - EUkip ACCOUNTS 2008

#Doc005* - EUkip ACCOUNTS 2008

To View EUkip's ACCOUNTS

for 2008

CLICK HERE

"In politics, stupidity is not a handicap."
Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821),

Regards,
Greg L-W.

for all my contact details & Blogs:
CLICK HERE

For More Information & Facts visit:
WEB SITES:
SilentMajority/
WelshAssembly

‘The arrogance and hubris of corrupt politicians
will be responsible for every drop of blood spilt
in the Wars of Disassociation, if Britain does not
leave the EU.

The ugly, centralised, undemocratic supra national policies being imposed by the centralised and largely unelected decisionmakers of The EU for alien aims, ailien values and to suit alien needs stand every possibility of creating 200,000,000 deaths across EUrope as a result of the blind arrogance and hubris of the idiologues in the central dictatorship, and their economic illiteracy marching hand in glove with the idiocy of The CAP & The CFP - both policies which deliver bills, destroy lives and denude food stocks.

The EU, due to the political idiocy and corruption of its undemocratic leaders, is now a net importer of food, no longer able to feed itself and with a decreasing range of over priced goods of little use to the rest of the world to sell with which to counter the net financial drain of endless imports.

British Politicians with pens and treachery, in pursuit
of their own agenda and greed, have done more
damage to the liberty, freedoms, rights and democracy
of the British peoples than any army in over 1,000 years.

The disastrous effects of British politicians selling Britain
into the thrall of foreign rule by the EU for their own
personal rewards has damaged the well-being of Britain
more than the armies of Hitler
and the Franco - German - Italian axis of 1939 - 1945.

~ for more Quotes & Facts:
http://www.silentmajority.co.uk/

############-\\\///-###########
#############= ~ = ############
###########(`~0~0~') ##########
----------oooO--------(_)-------Oooo---------
############Regards###########
##########M r C H A D##########

Until we gain our liberty, restore our sovereignty, repatriate our democracy and reinstate our Justice system and our borders - defended by our Police and Military armed with sustainable and obtainable weaponry:
Treat every election as a referendum.

Don't waste your vote on a self serving Politician in ANY election until we are liberated from the EU and are a Free Sovereign peoples, with independent control of our own borders, making and managing Law & Justice for our own benefit, in our own elected Westminster Parliament where we can fire our politicians at the ballot box, if they fail to represent OUR best interests.
Make your vote count
Write on YOUR ballot Paper
LEAVE THE EU

#Doc004* - WHO REALLY GOVERNS BRITAIN

#Doc004* - WHO GOVERNS BRITAIN - FREE BOOK

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!


The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership
& NEC is what gives the remaining 10%
a bad name!

WHO GOVERNS BRITAIN - FREE BOOK by Nirj DEVA MEP!


Hi,

Nirj Deva MEP has produced an excellent pamphlet all about:

WHO GOVERNS BRITAIN

Who Governs Britain? Nirj Deva analyses, for the first time, preciously which powers have been moved from Westminster to Brussel, and the likely impact of further changes.

It is 37 pages long and a relatively easy read which you can either read on line or download and print out if you CLICK HERE

To let the WORLD know WHO GOVERNS BRITAIN
There is a small icon of an envelope at the end of this Blog entry - all you have to do is click the Icon and you can mail upto 10 copies at a time, just fill in 10 'e'Mail addresses, separated by commas, into the box provided - you can also add a personal message to go with each 'e'Mail.

PLEASE Help spread the word.

It is such a pity that in the 16 years since EKIP was founded it has never noticably produced a single pamphlet of stature to back its arguments. EUkip for all its huff, puff & childish Bluster hasn't even drawn up a single document showing the benefits of leaving the EU, nor has it published any kind of Exit & Survival Plan for Britain.

They fail to state the gains in leaving and bang on about how awfull it is and they have no idea what to do TO LEAVE let alone HOW to survive and benefit thereafter.

Is it any wonder EUkip attracts such nuckle heads as leadership, such clowns as MEPs, such mindless sycophants as supporters and such liars to promote it!

EUkip's results in The EU elections were catastrophic - they were heading for about 3 MEPs due to incompetence, bad publicity, fraud and dishonesty - suddenly by virtue of repeatedly promoting The BNP and capitalising on the protest vote against Labour who were clearly perceived to be responsible for the corruption in Westminster EUkip gets another 10 MEPs.

What one has to ask oneself is would one want any of these useless articles EUkip has?

With 12 MEPs EUkip achieved little beyond bad publicity and a sell out during the last 5 years - without gaining a single individual of gravitas or stature it is unlikely they will do other than emulate their previous abject failures.

May I suggest before putting ANY trust in the serial litigant Marta Andreasen that you study a little more of this self interested foreigner who laterly pretends to concern for Britain and British values and although pro EU for many years has now slid from reformist to opposition , seemingly for the sake of a place on The Gravy Train.
To read more of this duplicitous woman CLICK HERE

"In politics, stupidity is not a handicap."
Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821),

Regards,
Greg L-W.

for all my contact details & Blogs:
CLICK HERE

For More Information & Facts visit:
WEB SITES:
SilentMajority/
WelshAssembly

‘The arrogance and hubris of corrupt politicians
will be responsible for every drop of blood spilt
in the Wars of Disassociation, if Britain does not
leave the EU.

The ugly, centralised, undemocratic supra national policies being imposed by the centralised and largely unelected decisionmakers of The EU for alien aims, ailien values and to suit alien needs stand every possibility of creating 200,000,000 deaths across EUrope as a result of the blind arrogance and hubris of the idiologues in the central dictatorship, and their economic illiteracy marching hand in glove with the idiocy of The CAP & The CFP - both policies which deliver bills, destroy lives and denude food stocks.

The EU, due to the political idiocy and corruption of its undemocratic leaders, is now a net importer of food, no longer able to feed itself and with a decreasing range of over priced goods of little use to the rest of the world to sell with which to counter the net financial drain of endless imports.

British Politicians with pens and treachery, in pursuit
of their own agenda and greed, have done more
damage to the liberty, freedoms, rights and democracy
of the British peoples than any army in over 1,000 years.

The disastrous effects of British politicians selling Britain
into the thrall of foreign rule by the EU for their own
personal rewards has damaged the well-being of Britain
more than the armies of Hitler
and the Franco - German - Italian axis of 1939 - 1945.

~ for more Quotes & Facts:
http://www.silentmajority.co.uk/

############-\\\///-###########
#############= ~ = ############
###########(`~0~0~') ##########
----------oooO--------(_)-------Oooo---------
############Regards###########
##########M r C H A D##########

Until we gain our liberty, restore our sovereignty, repatriate our democracy and reinstate our Justice system and our borders - defended by our Police and Military armed with sustainable and obtainable weaponry:
Treat every election as a referendum.

Don't waste your vote on a self serving Politician in ANY election until we are liberated from the EU and are a Free Sovereign peoples, with independent control of our own borders, making and managing Law & Justice for our own benefit, in our own elected Westminster Parliament where we can fire our politicians at the ballot box, if they fail to represent OUR best interests.
Make your vote count
Write on YOUR ballot Paper
LEAVE THE EU

BRITAIN & The EU - YESTERDAY, TODAY & TOMORROW

This Page will have details added as they become known.




BRITAIN & The EU


- YESTERDAY,


TODAY


&


TOMORROW

07 - Jun-09

FOR THE RESULTS

UK Total MEP Seats

Votes MEPs

Party - - - - - - - - % - - - - +/- % - - - - - Total - - - - +/-

CON - - - - - - - - 28.6 - - - - 1.2 - - - - - - - 24 - - - - - - 1

UKIP - - - - - - - -17.4 - - - - 0.5 - - - - - - - 13 - - - - - - 1

LAB - - - - - - - - 15.3 - - - - 7.0 - - - - - - - 11 - - - - - - 5

LibDim - - - - - - -13.9 - - - --m1.1- - - - - - - 10 - - - - - - 1

GRN - - - - - - - - -8.7 - - - - 2.5 - - - - - - - -2 - - - - - - 0

BNP - - - - - - - - -6.5 - - - - 1.4 - - - - - - - -2 - - - - - - 2

PC - - - - - - - - - 0.9 - - - - m0.1 - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - 0

SNP 0 0 0 0

SSP 0 0 0 0

OTHER - - - - - - - -8.6 - - - - 2.7 - - - - - - - -0 - - - - - - 0

63 of 69 seats declared.
Result excludes Northern Ireland & Scotland


Section 01:

Results for 2009

Section 02:

Results for 2004

Section 03:

Results by Region 2009 & then 2004

Section 04:

Results for 1999

Section 05:

ADDITIONAL DETAILS on 2009

RESULTS FROM 2009

SEATS: 72


TURNOUT: 34.8%

TURNOUT: 15,136,932

ELECTORATE: 44,173,690

Conservatives - - - - 28.6% - - - - - - 24 MEPs.

UKIP - - - - - - - - - - 17.4% - - - - - - 13 MEPs.

Labour - - - - - - - - - 15.3% - - - - - - 13 MEPs.

Lib.Dim. - - - - - - - - 13.9% - - - - - - 10 MEPs.

Greens - - - - - - - - - 8.7% - - - - - - - 2 MEPs.

BNP - - - - Yorkshire and the Humber 1 MEP with 10%

- - - - - - - - - - - - North-West - - - - - - -1 MEP with 08%

RESULTS FROM 2004

SEATS: 78

TURNOUT: 38.2%

ELECTORATE: 44,118,453

RESULTS from 2004
(EXCLUDING NORTHERN IRELAND)

PARTY- - - - - &% - - TOTAL

Conservative - 26.7 - - 27

Labour - - - - - 22.6 - - 19

UK - IP - - - - - 16.1 - - 12

Lib.Dim. - - - - 14.9- - 12

Green - - - - - - 06.3 -- 02

BNP - - - - - - - -04.9-- 00

SNP - - - - - - - -01.4 - -02

Plaid Cymru - 01.0 - -01

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

RESULTS BY REGIONS
2004 & 2009

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

01. EAST MIDLANDS

Jun-2004 - - 06 MEPs - - TURNOUT 43.4%

CLARK, Derek UKIP

HEATON-HARRIS, Chris CON

HELMER, Roger CON

KILROY-SILK, Robert UKIP

NEWTON DUNN, Bill Lib.Dim.

WHITEHEAD, Phillip LAB

2009 - - 5 MEPs - - TURNOUT %

CLARK, Derek - - - - - - - - - UKIP

HELMER, Roger - - - - - - - -CON

McCLARKIN, Emma - - - - -CON

NEWTON DUNN, Bill - - - -LibDim

WILLMOTT, Glenis - - - - - Lab

02. - EU - EASTERN REGION - UK

Jun-2004 - - 07 MEPs - - TURNOUT 36.5%

BEAZLEY, Christopher - - - CON

DUFF, Andrew - - - - - - - - - Lib.Dim.

HOWITT, Richard - - - - - - -LAB

STURDY, Robert - - - - - - - -CON

TITFORD, Jeffrey - - - - - - -UKIP

Van ORDEN, Geoffrey - - - CON

WISE, Tom - - - - - - - - - - - UKIP

2009 - - 7 MEPs - TURNOUT %

AGNEW, John - - - - - - - - - -UKIP

BANNERMANN, David - - - UKIP

DUFF, Andrew - - - - - - - - - LibDim

FORD, Vicky - - - - - - - - - - - Con

HOWITT, Richard - - - - - - - Lab

STURDY, Robert - - - - - - - -Con




Van ORDEN, Geoffrey - - - - Con

03. - EU - LONDON REGION - UK

Jun-2004 - - 09 MEPs - - TURNOUT 37.3%

BATTEN, Gerard - - - - - UKIP

BOWIS, John - - - - - - - -CON

EVANS, Robert - - - - - - -LAB

HONEYBALL, Mary - - - LAB

LAMBERT, Jean - - - - - -GRN

LUDFORD, Sarah - - - - -LibDim

MORAES, Claude - - - - -LAB

TANNOCK, Charles - - - CON

VILLIERS, Theresa - - - CON

2009 - - 8 MEPs - - TURNOUT %

BATTEN, Gerard - - - - - - - - - - - UKIP

HONEYBALL, Mary - - - - - - - - - Lab

KAMALL, Syed - - - - - - - - - - - - -CON

LAMBERT, Jean - - - - - - - - - - - GRN

LUDFORD, Sarah - - - - - - - - - - -LibDim

MORAES, Claude - - - - - - - - - - -Lab

TANNOCK, Charles - - - - - - - - - CON

YANNAKOUDAKIS, Marina - - - CON

04. EU - NORTH EAST - UK

Jun-2004 - 3 MEPs - TURNOUT %

CALLANAN, Martin - - - - Conservative

HALL, Fiona - - - - - - - - - -Lib.Dim.





HUGHES, Stephen - - - - - - Labour

2009 - 3 MEPs - TURNOUT %

CALLANAN, Martin - - - - Conservative

HALL, Fiona - - - - - - - - - -Lib.Dim.

HUGHES, Stephen - - - - - - Labour

05. EU - NORTH WEST - UK

Jun-2004 - 9 MEPs - TURNOUT 40.9%

ATKINS, Robert - - - - - -CON

DAVIES, Chris - - - - - - -LibDim

DOVER, Den - - - - - - - - CON

KARIM, Saj - - - - - - - - - LibDim

McCARTHY, Arlene - - - LAB

SUMBERG, David - - - - CON

TITLEY, Gary - - - - - - - -LAB

WHITTAKER, John - - - UKIP

WYNN, Terry - - - - - - - -LAB

2009 - 8 MEPs - TURNOUT %

ATKINS, Robert - - - - - - - - - CON



DAVIES, Chris - - - - - - - - - - LibDim



FOSTER, Jaqueline - - - - - - -CON



GRIFFIN, Nick - - - - - - - - - -BNP

KARIM, Sajjad - - - - - - - - - - CON



McCARTHY, Arlene - - - - - - Lab



NUTTALL, Paul - - - - - - - - - UKIP



SIMPSON, Brian - - - - - - - - Lab

06. EU - NORTHERN IRELAND - UK

Jun-2004 - 3 MEPs - TURNOUT 51.2%

ALLISTER, J. - - - - - DUP

De BRUN, B. - - - - - -SF

NICHOLSON, J. - - -UUP

2009 - 3 MEPs - TURNOUT %

de BRUN, Bairbre - - - - SF

DODDS, Diane - - - - - - DUP

Jim Nicholson - - - - - - UCUNF

07. EU - SCOTLAND - UK

Jun-2004 - 7 MEPs - TURNOUT 30.9%

ATWOOLL, Elspeth - - - - - - - - - LibDim

HUDGHTON, Ian - - - - - - - - - - -SNP

MARTIN, David - - - - - - - - - - - -LAB

PURVIS, John - - - - - - - - - - - - - CON

SMITH, Alyn - - - - - - - - - - - - - -SNP

STEVENSON, Struan - - - - - - - CON

STIHLER, Catherine - - - - - - - - LAB

2009 - 6 MEPs - TURNOUT %

HUDGHTON, Ian - SNP

LYON, George - Lib.Dim.

MARTIN, David - Lab

SMITH, Alyn - SNP

STIHLER, Catherine - Lab

STEVENSON, Struan - CON

08. EU - SOUTH EAST - UK

Jun-2004 - 10 MEPs - TURNOUT 36.5%

ASHWORTH, Richard - - - - CON

DEVA, Nirj - - - - - - - - - - - - - CON

ELLES, James - - - - - - - - - - - CON

FARAGE, Nigel - - - - - - - - - -UKIP

HANNAN, Daniel - - - - - - - -CON

HUHNE, Chris - - - - - - - - - -LibDim

LUCAS, Caroline - - - - - - - -GRN

MOTE, Ashley - - - - - - - - - - UKIP

NICHOLSON, Emma - - - - - LD

SKINNER, Peter - - - - - - - - LAB

2009 -10 MEPs - TURNOUT %

ANDREASEN, Marta - - - - - -UKIP



ASHWORTH, Richard - - - - -CON



BEARDER, Cathrine - - - - - -LibDim



BOWLES, Sharon - - - - - - - -Lib Dim



DIVA, Nirj - - - - - - - - - - - - -CON



ELLES, James - - - - - - - - - -CON



FARAGE, Nigel - - - - - - - - - UKIP

HANNAN, Daniel - - - - - - - - CON

LUCAS, Caroline - - - - - - - -GRN



SKINNER, Peter - - - - - - - - Lab

09. EU - SOUTH WEST - UK

Jun-2004 - 7 MEPs - TURNOUT 37.6%

BOOTH, Graham - - - - - UKIP

CHICHESTER, Giles - - CON

FORD, Glyn - - - - - - - - LAB

JACKSON, Caroline - - -CON

KNAPMAN, Roger - - - -UKIP

PARISH, Neil - - - - - - - CON

WATSON, Graham - - - LibD

2009 - 6 MEPs - TURNOUT %

CHICHESTER, Giles - - - - - - - - - - -CON



COLMAN, Trevor - - - - - - - - - - - - - UKIP



DARTMOUTH, William Earl of - - - UKIP


FOX, Ashley - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -CON


GIRLING, Julie - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -CON



WATSON, Graham - - - - - - - - - - - - LibDim

10. EU - WALES - UK

Jun-2004 - 4 MEPs - TURNOUT 41.4%

EVANS, Jill - - - - - - - PC

EVANS, Jonathan - - CON

KINNOCK, Glenys - -LAB

MORGAN, Eluned - - LAB

2009 XX MEPs - TURNOUT %

BUFTON, John - - - - - UKIP

EVANS, Jill - - - - - - - -PC

SWINBURNE, Kay - - CON

VAUGHAN, Derek - - - Lab

11. EU - WEST MIDLANDS - UK

Jun-2004 - 7 MEPs - TURNOUT 36%

BRADBOURN, Philip - - - - CON

BUSHILL - MATTHEWS, Philip - CON

CASHMAN, Michael - - - - - LAB

GILL, Neena - - - - - - - - - - -LAB

HARBOUR, Malcolm - - - - CON

LYNNE, Liz - - - - - - - - - - - LibDim

NATTRASS, Mike - - - - - - -UKIP

2009 - 6 MEPs - TURNOUT %

BRADBOURNE, Philip - - - - - - - - - - CON

CASHMAN, Michael - - - - - - - - - - - -Lab

HARBOUR, Malcolm - - - - - - - - - - - -CON

LYNNE, Liz - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LibDim

NATTRASS, Mike - - - - - - - - - - - - - - UKIP

SINCLAIRE, Nikki - - - - - - - - - - - - - UKIP

12. EU - YORKSHIRE & HUMBER - UK

Jun-2004 - 6 MEPs - TURNOUT 42.6%

BLOOM, Godfrey - - - - - - UKIP

CORBETT, Richard - - - - -LAB

KIRKHOPE, Timothy - - - CON

McAVAN, Linda - - - - - - - LAB

Edward McMillan-Scott - CON

WALLIS, Diana - - - - - - - LibDim

2009 XX MEPs - TURNOUT %

BLOOM, Graham - - - UKIP

BRONZE, Andrew - - -BNP

KIRKHOPE, Timothy - - - CON

MacMILLAN - SCOTT, Edward - - - CON

McAVAN, Linda - - - Lab

WALLIS, Diana - - - LibDim

RESULTS FROM 1999

PARTY - - - - - MEPs - - - - - VOTE %

Conservative - - 36 - - - - - - - - 33.5

Labour - - - - - - 29 - - - - - - - - 26.3

Lib.Dim. - - - - - 10 - - - - - - - - 11.9

Green - - - - - - 02 - - - - - - - - 05.9

Plaid Cymru - - 02 - - - - - - - - 01.7

SNP - - - - - - - 02 - - - - - - - - 02.5

UK - IP - - - - - 03 - - - - - - - - 06.5

Ulster UP - - - - 01 - - - - - - - - 01.1

So.Dim.&Lib.P - 01 - - - - - - - -01.8

Dem.Uni.P - - - 01 - - - - - - - - -01.8

MORE DETAILS on 2009

Conservative

UK Independence Party

Liberal Democrats

Labour

Green Party

British National Party

English Democrat

United Kingdom First

Christian Party-Christian Peoples Alliance

Socialist Labour Party

No2EU

Animals Count

Libertas

Independent - Peter Rigby

Jury Team

Fair Play Fair Trade Party

Independent - Duncan Robertson

Independent - Francis Apaloo

Independent - Gene Alcantara

Independent - Haroon Saad

Independent - Jan Jananayagam

Independent - Katie Hopkins

Independent - Sohale Rahman

Independent - Steven Cheung

Mebyon Kernow

Pensioners Party

Plaid Cymru

Scottish National Party

Scottish Socialist Party

Socialist Party of Great Britain

The Peace Party

The Roman Party

Wai D

Yes 2 Europe

THE FOLLOWING

IS FROM

Dr. Richard NORTH's
BLOG

@

CLICK HERE

Monday, June 08, 2009

European elections 2009

This is our running post, on which we'll follow the UK results as they come in. Updates added at the bottom.

In the 2004 elections the Tories pulled 26.7 percent of the vote and Labour got 22.6. UKIP grabbed 16.1 percent, beating the Lib-Dems into third place, trailing with 14.9 percent. The Greens got 6.3 and the BNP 4.9 percent.

Then, the candidates were fighting for 78 seats, the electorate producing a turnout of 38.2 percent. Under the Nice rules, only 72 seats are being fought.

20.30: It's going to be an interesting night. In the North East, with only three seats up for grabs, Labour seems set to take one. But the shock is that - at this time - the Tories and UKIP are "neck and neck", with the Lib-Dems coming fourth. Last time round, it was the three main parties that took the seats.

20.33: East Midlands … Keith Vaz believes the Labour vote is holding up. This is the region where, in 2005, Kilroy was standing, bringing in two seats. UKIP is on the back foot here.

20.41: First official estimate of the EU-wide turnout - 43.01 percent of eligible voters voted, compared with 45.47 percent last time.

20.49: In Ireland, Brian Cowen's "embattled Government" is under massive strain after its worst ever election meltdown and opposition claims it no longer has any credibility. The Dail will resume on Tuesday with a resurgent Fine Gael, now the largest party in the state for the first time, preparing to table a vote of no confidence.

20.50: A reminder - Northern Ireland takes three seats. The count there does not start until 9am tomorrow. Thus, we only get 69 results tonight. Official results start coming in from 9pm this evening.

20.53: Cornwall: Labour in sixth place?

20.59: Eastern region – UKIP looks as if they could have two, possibly three (outside chance). BNP vote collapsed.

21.00: Denmark - UEN and Greens each gain a seat. Sarkozy gets 11 more seats in France. Not an anti-government vote there, but likely to be an anomaly. Greens also up. Anti-capitalists also up.

21.04: North West - Lib-Dims claiming BNP will not get a seat.

21.10: Labour meltdown in Wales and Scotland predicted.

21.12: Swedish exit polls suggest the new populist Pirate Party has polled 7.4 percent of the vote. The opposition Social Democrats are getting 25 percent, up slightly from 2004. The biggest losers seem to be the the Left Party. Exit polls give it 5.1 per cent.

21.17: Romania's ruling coalition won the most votes. Each are expected to take one third of the 33 MEP seats on offer. The centre-left Social-Democrats have won 30.8 percent of the vote. The centrist Democrat-Liberals were just 0.3 percent behind. Each party is expected to win about 11 seats.

21.23: Eastern region: UKIP looking almost certainly three seats. UKFirst lead the rest of the minority groups, beating BNP.

21.36: In Lebanon, on the other hand, the turn-out was 52 per cent; somewhat higher than across the EU. Just thought I'd mention it.

21:40: Orkney led the pack, beating all the other local authority areas to announce its outcome. Lib-Dims secured 31.9 percent, SNP second on 20.2 percent, the Conservatives on 15.2 percent, Greens on 9.2 percent, UKIP on 8.5 percent, and the Labour Party trailing in sixth place on 7.0 percent. Turnout was 25.9 per cent.

21.43: Sunderland: Labour 147,338, Cons 116,911, Lib-dims 103,444, UKIP 90,700, BNP 52,700, Greens 34,081, English Democrats 13,007, Socialist Labour Party 10,238, No2EU 8,066, Christian Party 7,263, Libertas 3,010, Jury Team 2,904. Labour gets one seat, second goes to Tories and the third to the Lib Dims. No change ... UKIP misses out with 15.4 percent of the vote, up 3.2. Labour down nine percent, Tories up one. At a rough count, the "tiddlers" (apart from BNP, Greens and UKIP) took 43,000 votes. If half had gone to UKIP, it would have got the seat.

21.48: Farage very defensive on BBC.

21.55: Tories might top the poll in Wales. UKIP might just get the fourth (of four) seats.

21.59: German Chancellor Angela Merkel's conservatives suffered around a six-percentage-point fall in their share of the vote but had a clear lead over other parties. The vote is seen a litmus test for Merkel ahead of the general election in September. FDP set to take 12 seats.

22.09: Less than 35 percent turnout in Germany.

22.14: Highest turnout recorded in Belgium at 91 percent.

22.17: The Fragrant One (Margot Wallstrom) calls the low turnout "a bad result." It shows the need to work to "change the perception" that the European Union is detached from its citizens. Not that the EU is "detached" - this is just a "perception". The voters got it wrong again.

22.32: Projections show Germany's Social Democrats heading for their worst showing in a nationwide election since the Second World War. But, with a 35 percent turnout (against 37.5 percent in 2004) it is difficult to judge. The Incidentally, the largest federal Land, North Rhine-Westphalia, only polled 18 percent.

22.33: Bruno Waterfield reports that the EU parliament has passed 404 laws since the last elections in 2004. Another 233 are in the pipeline, meaning that MEPs are currently "churning out" two pieces of EU law a week.

22.36: Yorkshire - Con Home suggests 2 Cons and one each for Lab, Lib-Dims, UKIP and BNP.

22.40: Count almost finished. Looks as if the Yorks result stands ... BNP's first seat, outperforming the North West.

22.44: Turnout in the North West was 31.9 percent. Manchester and Liverpool well down at 24 and 27 percent respectively. Results expected at around 11.30pm.

22.47: East Midlands expected in half-hour. UKIP vote well down.

22.50: Spain: "Right wing" People's party wins its first national victory for nine years. Socialist prime minister Zapatero sees a loss of 3.75 percentage points just 15 months after winning a general election.

22.51: In Cornwall, South West Region, the Cornish Nationalist Party seems to have beaten Labour, pushing it into sixth place.

22.52: Three updates have gone AWOL while everything the boss puts up stays up. I suspect a plot. If this goes on there will be a rebellion in Shepherds Bush.

23.00: One last attempt to report on a few items from other countries. If this does not work, the rebellion will take off. It will be painful for all concerned.

In Denmark Prime Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen's Liberals are expected to keep their three seats while the Social Democrats, though in the lead, may well lose one to the Danish People's Party, usually described as anti-immigrant. It is, also, a centre-right conservative party that opposes further erosion of Danish sovereignty and Denmark's entry into the single currency. The People's Movement against the EU, which campaigns for Danish withdrawal from the bloc, is expected to hold on to its one seat. But the Eurosceptic June movement will not gain any MEPs. The turn-out was actually higher than in 2004 at 51 per cent, up from 47.9 per cent.

In Hungary the opposition FIDESZ party is set to take 16 seats out of the 22 allotted to the country. The Social Democrats are likely to have 4, down from 9 and the right-wing nationalist party, the Jobbik, looks like taking 2.

In Finland the Eurosceptic 'True Finns' party and the Finnish Christian Democrats are each expected to win two seats. The centre-right National Coalition Party, the liberal Centre Party and the Social Democratic Party are all projected to lose a seat each, taking them down to three, three and two MEPs respectively.

The Greens and the Swedish People's Party, who are also in the government, are expected to maintain a seat each.

23.12: Eastern Region result - Conservative 500,331 (31.2 - up 0.4 percent), UKIP, 313,921 (19.6 - no change), Lib Dims 221,235, Labour 167,833, Greens 141,016, BNP 97,013, UKFirst 38,185, English Democrats 32,211, Christian Party, 24,646, No2EU 13,923, SDP 13,599, Animals count 13,201, Libertas 9,940, Independent 9,916, Jury Team 6,354, Rejected 13,164. MEPs ... three Con, two UKIP, one LD, one Labour. Labour loses six percent.

23.28: Yorkshire: First BNP victory - Two Con, one Lab, one UKIP, one Lib-Dem, one BNP. Andy Burnham says "a sad moment". Share: Conservatives on 25 percent (no change) Labour down 8 percent.

Detailed results: Cons 299,802, Lab 230,009, UKIP 213,750 (17.4 percent, up 2.9), BNP 120,456 (8.5 percent, up 1.8) Greens 104,456, English Democrats 31,287, SLP 19,380, Christian Party 16,742, No2EU 15,614, Jury Team 7,181, Libertas 6,268.

24:44: Wales: One Conservative, One Labour, One Plaid and one UKIP.





00.01: A quick break from the UK results. Why, incidentally, is it taking so long to count them? Counting started at 4pm and so far we have had three results. What is keeping the others? Can find nothing about London, incidentally. Surely, those drongos aren't leaving the counting till tomorrow?

Meanwhile, in the Czech Republic the centre-right ODS has done reasonably well. It has gained 28.9 percent of the vote and retained nine seats. The Social Democrats gained 24.6 per cent and will have 7 seats. The Communist Party, unreformed since 1989, saw its vote drop from 20.3 to 15.5 percent and therefore lost two seats. The Christian Democrats gained a second seat, despite seeing their share of the vote drop from 9.6 to 8.2 percent.

00.09: Welsh results: Conservatives 145,193 (21.2 percent, up 1.8), Labour 138,852 (20.3 percent, down 12.2), Plaid 126, 702 (18.5 - up 1.1), UKIP 87,585 (12.8 - up 2.3), Lib-Dims 73,082 (10.7 - up 2.0) Greens 38,160 (5.6 - up 5.6) BNP 37,114 (5.6 - up 2.5) Christian Party 13,037, SLP 12,402, No2EU 8,600, Jury Team 3,793.

00.16: West Midlands - could be two UKIP.

00.18: Nigel Farage says: "So far there are tremors but before the end of the night we could have created a political earthquake."

0021: Vote share (BBC projection): Cons 27 percent, UKIP 17 percent, Labour (third place) 16 percent, Lib Dims 14 percent, Green 9 percent, BNP 6 percent. "The bottom end of Labour's expectations - it would be difficult for a major national party to do any worse."

00.22: London result delayed by "computer failure". (Typical. HS)

00.23: Turn-out in Slovakia was 19.6 percent, up from 2004 when it was 16.7 percent. Centre-left are in the lead. European Voice calls Slovakia the most apathetic country in the EU. Maybe they are just more honest about their politicians.

00.29: Worst Labour result in Wales since 1918.

00.34: Richard Corbett is the casualty in Yorkshire. He is deputy leader of Labour MEPs - and a rabid europhile.


00.36: BBC projects thirteen seats for UKIP.

00.42: London: Conservatives 479,037, Lab 372,590, Lib-Dims 240,156, Greens 190,589, UKIP 188,440, BNP 86,420, Christian Party 51,336, Ind - Jananayagam 50,014, English Democrats 24,477, JT 7,284, N2E 17,758, Pl 8,444, SLP 15,3006, SPGB 4,050, Yes 2 E 3,384, Ind 1,972, Ind, 4,918, Ind, 3,248, Ind 1,603, Rejected 11,374

Three Conservatives, two Labour, one Lib-Dim, one Green, one UKIP. One less seat ... Labour loses one, otherwise no change. UKIP vote down 1.6 percent.

00.51: BBC predicts UKIP and Labour will gain same number of seats.

00.53: East Midlands. Two Con, one Lab, one UKIP, one Lib-Dim. Kilroy effect strikes ... UKIP down 10 percent, loses one seat. Lib-Dims gain one.

1.02: Pirate Party in Sweden will take only one seat with 7.1 percent of the vote. Shame. The four government coalition parties (moderately centre right) have won 42.5 percent of the vote. The Social Democrats and their allies, the Left Party and the Greens won 41.1 percent. Voter turn-out 43.8 percent, which is actually up on 2004.

1.07: According to the BBC UKIP is now in third position with 1,096,380, which is 15.5 per cent and 6 seats. Labour is second with 1,263,567, 17.8 per cent and 7 seats. Conservatives lead with 1,911,549, 12.0 per cent (1.6 per cent up) and 12 seats.

01.21: South West Region: BNP 60,889, Christian Party 21,329, Conservatives 468,742, English Democrats 25,313, Fair Pay, 7,151, Jury Team 5,758, Lib-Dims 266,253, Cormwall 14,922, No2EU 9,741, Pension 37,785, Libertas 7,292, SLP 10,033, Greens 144,178, Labour 118,716, UKIP 341,845, YD 789, Ind 8,971

Three Conservatives, two UKIP, one Lib-Dim. Cons gain one – no Labour MEP, in fifth place.

01.26: South East Region: (partial results) BNP 101,769, Christian Party 35,712, Conservatives 812,288, English Democrats 52,526, Fair Pay, 7,151, Jury Team 14,1725,758, Lib-Dims 330,440, No2EU 21,455, Pension 16,768, Libertas 7,292, Greens 144,178, Labour 192,592, UKIP 440,002.

Four Cons, two UKIP, two Lib-Dim, one Green, one Labour. No change in seats. Hannan gets back in. Labour in fifth place. Marta Andreasen is in. Could be fun. She knows where the bodies are buried.

01.29: "Nothing is solid anymore," says The Guardian. Where do they get them from?

01.32: Eight declared ... two to go tonight. NI and Scotland tomorrow.

01.43: Polly Toynbee calls for Brown to stand down.

Labour down seven percent overall, on results so far declared. Philip Webster, The Times's political editor is reporting that Gordon Brown's allies and at least some of those who want him out appeared to agree yesterday that he should be given a breathing space after the shock of the European election results.

01.55: UKIP is on course to finishing second after the Conservatives and there are rumours that Nick Griffin has won a seat.

01.56: West Midland: Tories two, UKIP two (as predicted), Labour one, Lib-Dims one. BNP and Greens didn't make it. Only one more to go. Hurrah.

02.01: North West - unofficial declaration. Nick Griffin gets in. Three Tory, two Labour, one UKIP, one Lib-Dim and one BNP. Labour loses one. That's it folks. More later today.

02.11: Heh! North West declares officially. Conservatives: 423,174, 25.6 percent (+1.5), 3 seats - no change; Labour: 336,831, 20.4 percent (-6.9), 2 seats - lose 1; UKIP: 261,740, 15.8 percent (+1.7), 1 seat - no change; Lib-Dims: 235,639, 14.3 percent (-1.6), 1 seat - no change; BNP: 132,094, 8.0 percent (+1.6), 1 seat. Nick Griffin is in.
More details in the morning.
This time truly so.

You can find masses more on Richard's Blog CLICK HERE

By the way have you read Richard's latest book, which is so accurate it has embarrassed 'The Military, Political complex & exposed them'

The 'Ministry of Defeat' covers Britain's involvement in Iraq from 2003 until we were forced to pull out having totally wasted 136 young British soldiers lives and injuring 1,000s more to absolutely no gain in 2009 - largely due to the incompetence of Politicians, The MoD & senior Military Officers in 2009.

For more details CLICK HERE