UKIP-vs-EUkip

<b>UKIP-vs-EUkip</b>
CLICK The Pic. for TRAVEL!

Monday, 6 September 2010

#Doc052* - McKENZIE, Winston 01 -


#Doc052* - McKENZIE, Winston 01 -

McKENZIE, Winston Truman
857 Votes Allocated NEC 2010


A TOTALLY inappropriate candidate for UKIP, having stood for various Parties in numerous elections, having joind most parties at one time or another - having had a string of failed jobs behind him including the bar & grill with gym he ran where when raided by the police 25 arrests were made for possesion of drugs, dealing and firearms.

That he is considered appropriate by UKIP such that is now considered one of the 4 most appropriate candidates for leadership shows UKIP for the farce it really is.

################

Here are some of the antics of this inadequate, so very UKIP!:

2002. McKenzie Bros Bar & Grill went into liquidation with the Gym and was closed down after a police raid resulted in 25 people on the premises being charged with drugs and firearms offences

2002 - Left Labour Party and joined the Lib Dims

2003 - Left Lib Dims to be an Independent

2004 - Joined Kilroy-Silk's Veritas Party and then ran for leader in 2005

2005 - Auditioned for X-Factor

2006 Joined the Conservative Party and tried to get their London Mayoral nomination in 2007. Unsurprisingly failed, left them in a display of self interest!

2008. Stood as an independent Mayoral candidate and came 10th.

2009 Formed the Unity Party  - a pro-EUropean and pan EUropean federalist party.

2009 Joined UKIP and immediately stood for leader.


Subsequently leaps up and down like a performing flea for attention at any cost!

Little more than a political prostitute and attention speaker.

#####################

Even more worrying is that the past tokenry leader Lord Pearson and the defacto leader of many years again awaiting coronation, Nigel Farage MEP believes he is suitable to advocate him as a leader.

It does look as if this rather sad figure is being used and abused as UKIP's tokenery Black working class 'exhibit'.

McKenzie has cropped up as 'an also ran' at numerous UKIP elections - has stood for Veritas and had his own party having been turned down by Political Parties in the past. Would perhaps feature as tokenism in the racist environs of UKIP's EFD Partners and for more info. on this one time boxer and publican (I gather their pub went VERY bust) CLICK HERE 

McKenzie has helped himself hugely by avoiding the signatures of the corrupt present leadership and their goffers.
Aged 53. Former boxer.

Says “the rise and rise of UKIP is inevitable”.
Not under the present leadership, Winston!
McKenzie has previously been a member of Labour, the Tories and Veritas.
He also ran as an independent (but under the self-proclaimed title 'Black Voice for Great Britain') in the Brent East by-election in 2003, finishing seventh, with less than 1% of the vote.
Has ambitions to lead UKIP. An ambition that we doubt he will achieve.
Is not very impressed with some of UKIP’s allies in the EFD Group.
Some would say that he is a featherweight candidate. Excuse the pun!
To view the original of this comment CLICK HERE

#
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Winston Truman McKenzie (born 23 October 1953, in Jamaica) is a UK politician, notable for having joined every major political party, and for having stood as an independent or minor party candidate on numerous occasions. He is currently standing for the UKIP leadership.
McKenzie was originally a middleweight boxer and was the All England National Amateur Boxing Champion, and he is an older brother of boxer Duke McKenzie. He contended that after an underprivileged childhood, "boxing was my salvation".[1] However, his boxing career was cut short at 23 by two detached retinas.[2] He later worked as a hairdresser, a rug wholesaler, a letting agent and a garage mechanic. He also ran a pub with his brothers, the McKenzie Bros Bar & Grill, which closed down in 2002 after a police raid resulted in 25 people on the premises being charged with drugs and firearms offences.[3] He is now a youth worker.
In 2005, he unsuccessfully auditioned for "The X Factor".[4]

Political career
McKenzie first joined the Labour Party in the 1980s.[5] In 2002, he joined the Liberal Democrats, and in February 2003 was quoted in the press as saying ""I'm still very involved with the Liberal Democrats and have every intention of standing for MP in the next election."".[3] By the September 2003 Brent East by-election, he had left the Liberal Democrats, and he stood as an Independent candidate, on a slogan of "The black voice for Great Britain" and a platform of an immediate end to all immigration and asylum, and increasing sports facilities for young people.[6] He polled 197 votes (0.94%), coming 7th out of 16 candidates.[7]

In 2004, McKenzie joined the newly-formed Veritas party, calling for "a blanket ban on immigration and asylum for one year",[8] and becoming its principal spokesman on sport.[5] In the 2005 general election, he stood for Veritas in Croydon North, coming 7th of 9 candidates with 324 votes (0.7%). After the election, he attacked party leader Robert Kilroy-Silk, whom he publicly blamed for his defeat, and for his lost deposit and other financial losses as a result of his campaign.[9] He resigned from Veritas 2 weeks after the 2005 election (and 3 months after originally joining), before then rejoining Veritas when Kilroy-Silk stepped down as leader, so that he could stand for leader of Veritas. He lost.[10] In between his two short memberships of Veritas, he stood in the 16 June 2005 Fieldway by-election to Croydon Council, as an Independent. He came 4th of 5 candidates, polling 47 votes (2.47%) - the only candidate he beat was standing for the Official Monster Raving Loony Party.[10][11]

After the local press reported his 2004 "inaugural Croydon youth games ended in farce [in] October after many events were cancelled at short notice",[8] he accused the local Conservative council of being "racist" in failing to support the endeavour,[10] but he appears to have changed his opinion of the Conservatives by November 2006, when he joined the Conservative party, announcing his intention to be the next Mayor of London. He stood in 2007 for the Conservative party's nomination, but failed to attract enough support to make the shortlist. He then left the Conservative Party by the end of the year, and stood in the 2008 Mayoral election as an Independent candidate, under the slogans "I float like a butterfly and sting like a bee; I've got the policies they can't see" and "They said it couldn't be done".[1] He came last of the 10 candidates, polling 5,389 votes. (0.22%) [2]
In March 2009, McKenzie founded The Unity Party and announced he would be the Unity Party candidate for Croydon Central at the next UK general election.[12] In October 2009, McKenzie reported that Unity had folded as a party because of the withdrawal of its main financial backer.[13]
In September 2009 he joined the United Kingdom Independence Party and immediately announced he was a candidate in their leadership election to succeed Nigel Farage. However, as he was still the leader of the Unity Party, he was barred from standing in the leadership election, and his candidature was blocked.[14] In February 2010 McKenzie was adopted as UKIP's candidate for Tottenham.[15] In the 2010 general election he came 6th of 10 candidates in Tottenham, polling 466 votes (1.1%).[16]
In September 2010, the BBC reported that McKenzie intends to stand for leader of UKIP again, after Lord Pearson of Rannoch resigned having only been leader for nine months.[17] Winston McKenzie's Proposer for the Party Leadership of UKIP is Marianne Bowness. Assentors include Nigel Farage MEP who is the defacto leader and winner and seems not to learn from his mistakes having most ineptly proposed the last leader and denigrated all his MEPs and contestants on TV quite deliberately; also the last titular Leader Lord Pearson after his calamitous intervention his support for both Farage AND McKenzie seems as inept as his active campaigning in the General Election for The Tories, UKIP & Labour! To be fair he did say he was no good as a leader, which the members seem heartily to agree with.
To view the original entry CLICK HERE

~~~~~~######~~~~~~
06 Sep 2010
We hear the serial candidate Winston McKenzie plans to stand but I presume he is confused what the party is as yet - PERHAPS he only heard the word Party and will turn up with what is left of his brother's pub! ...
04 Aug 2010
McKENZIE, Winston - Has cropped up as an also ran at numerous UKIP elections - McWHIRTER, Robert - Indecisive but willing to tollerate corruption about which he knows, has resigned in disgust in the past but returned when his absence ...
21 Jul 2010
or more on this chappie Winston McKenzie you may find consideration of his 'Bruvvers', his 'Minders and his strange POWA politics available at CLICK HERE FOR THE FULL CANDIDATES DATA UPDATED CLICK HERE ...
05 Oct 2009
#639* - Winston McKENZIE LEADERSHIP BID? Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!The corruption of some of EUkip's leadership, their anti UKIP claque & the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!Winston McKENZIE'S LEADERSHIP ...
Make your vote count vote:
 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance
or Write on YOUR ballot Paper 
Enhanced by Zemanta

#Doc051* - SMITH, Jason 01

#Doc051* - SMITH, Jason 01

SMITH, Jason

Jason Smith runs his own Sports, Hypnosis & Hypnotherapy business specialising in Business Development, Sports Enhancement and weight loss, working with business, professional and amateur athletes and sports teams. Bradford & District Chairman and spokesman for UKIP.

Member of the Bradford Civic Society Regeneration Committee.

Bradford No2ID Coordinator Hobbies include alternative therapies, writing comedy, snooker, fantasy football and power-lifting. Organises regular charity sporting events in aid of cancer charities.
Dear Sir/Madam,

As you may or may not know I have announced my intention to stand for the UKIP leadership,

I will of course be a massive underdog, no doubt competing against elected officials, Lords and the face of UKIP Nigel Farage – while I respect Nigel immensely and believe he should continue to be the face and spokesman for UKIP, I believe I could be a great compliment to him and UKIP – UKIP needs a public face but also a leader.

UKIP needs a new strategy and I believe I have the ability and experience to deliver this.

I will shortly be publishing a detailed manifesto, but I am keen not to give my opponents the ‘keys to victory’, instead I will present (below) a mini manifesto where I will detail my unique abilities and my blueprint for UKIP’s success.

My Guiding Principles for UKIP

UKIP should be a party that speaks to every section of the population. UKIP has been too dogmatic in the past; we are a broad church and should be open for all.

UKIP’s brand should be as a ‘libertarian’ party. If UKIP don’t know who they are, how can the public? Freedom should underpin all our strategy and goals.

UKIP should have a coherent and consistent local strategy. UKIP focus must be at a local level – all levels of UKIP must buy in to this.

UKIP should be a real opposition party with competent national spokesman, available to the media and local branches in the UK 24-7.

What I bring to the table

Transforming business: I will work with UKIP as I do with big business, developing their strategy and putting the right pieces in place to allow UKIP to grow, become a powerful political force and ultimately obtain freedom.

Political strategist: elections must be fought like military campaigns. I will unveil a blueprint for UKIP success which will further develop UKIPs structure and strategies at all levels.

UKIP experience: Experience at branch and regional level. I know how UKIP works and more importantly how it doesn’t work.

Speaking experience: I will sell UKIP’s brand but won’t be its only spokesman – we will reject the ‘presidential’ format and lead an army of ‘experts’ behind our general Nigel Farage.

Desire: I am true UKIP, not a Tory or Labour cast off. I am committed to the cause and ready for the fight.

Blueprint for Success

Run UKIP like a business: not like an old boys club. UKIP is driving forward, but much too slowly and often hazardously. UKIP has grown too big to be managed as it currently is.

Policy: Engage the members and people. Let the people shape UKIP via referenda; we must show the people that we are the only true Democratic Party. It is not about changing your policy or principles but changing people’s perception of.

Make news: all too often UKIP follows the big stories, often very far behind. Let’s make the news and use the media.

Evolution: let us evolve in to a fully inclusive broad party. Freedom is a concept that appeals to all, but with all products you first must sell.

Ultimately the UKIP leadership will come down to 3 choices:
1. The face of UKIP- Nigel Farage
2. The “official” UKIP candidates - MEPs, Lords etc
3. The Peoples’ Champion – Jason Smith

I trust the people; let us see if the trust can be reciprocated.

Let me know if you feel you can support me,
Cheers - Jason

View the video as you may never see this candidate again:

UKIP leadership

Dear UKIP supporters,

After much deliberation, I have decided not to stand for the UKIP leadership. After canvassing many members I was encouraged that the majority of the membership shared my vision, this was unfortunately accompanied by a fear of the unknown, entirely understandable in the current UKIP landscape – better to play it safe was the feeling.
While the reality I think is, if you walk behind the view never changes.

It became clear that in order to sell and new strategy and vision to UKIP it would require more than a few weeks in the run up to the leadership election. Having stood this time would have shortchanged me and I feel the members of UKIP. I simply could not, at this time, compete with the elite, their profile, finance or political machine.

I would need to instead compete on a platform of ideas, this would involve fully rolling out my strategy and vision and giving our members time to digest it, this battle simply came too quickly for us, we would be going in to battle without the proper tools – something our troops are more than accustomed to.

What initially could be viewed as an obstacle I can now recognise as an opportunity. Rather than see this as UKIPs final chapter, I believe this to be a new page in UKIP’s evolution. My intended candidacy has brought me great heart and many kindred spirits, activists who felt powerless now have a hope, a new path for UKIP.

It seems another grassroots champion shares my view, that man is Frank Maloney – had we come together earlier then we may have just run the elite boys close. As it stands we can now regroup and look forward. Stay tuned, the revolution has begun.

Again, thanks for all your support,
Cheers, Jason
Make your vote count vote:
 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance
or Write on YOUR ballot Paper 

Thursday, 2 September 2010

#Doc050* - TITFORD, Jeffrey 01 - LEADER + INTERIM + LINKS!

#Doc050* - TITFORD, Jeffrey 01 - LEADER + INTERIM + LINKS!

TITFORD, Jeffrey
Jeffrey TITFORD a Past UKIP MEP, & Past Leader

Long past, this elderly chap requires no more public canteen medals for his belittlement and exploitation.

The publicity handout picture above would seem to be most kind but I gather he still has a predilection for ties with spots on and even at times lapels similarly adorned but allowance must be made for his age as he approaches 78 in a months time - we appreciate he made it clear he had dreaded retirement and sitting at home with his wife.

It is clearly understood that after his corruption of the selection process to try to rig a position on the MEP list to replace him. Titford's placeman the oleagenous and untrustworthy circus performer Stuart Gulleford who has so constantly tried to ride two horses at the same time betraying both masters.

Many will remember the witnessed claims of Gulleford and Titford colluding in flagrant abuse of the data protection act to download and read the eMails of trusted and elected Officers of UKIP for their personal gain in much the same dishonest way that Mark Croucher has used the data base as a member of staff to try to defame and lie about people.

You will be aware that it was from Jeffrey Titford's office that Tony Bennett did such harm to the party reputation and setting out to sabotage the party with the creation of Veritas. Then next to be elevated from Titford's office was the criminal Tom Wise who is widely believed to have rigged the election process with the aid of Jeffrey to become an MEP displacing Robin Page under most dubious circumstances.

The appointment of Titford as a bidable and malleable interim leader is hardly surprising he has held the role of puppet leader many times in the past as many will recall. Though clearly a crass appointment now, even if he will do what he is told.

Do not forget that if Jeffrey Titford has a shred of integrity his first job will be to set aside the clearly corrupt NEC election results as invalid - It is my contention that poor old geriatric may well remind many of the first stanza of Coleridge's famous poem 'Eskimo Nell' and prove too gonadically challenged to carry out his duty.

Jeffrey's first stab at the job was after I had circulated a letter from Bill jamieson and Christopher Booker with a covering letter to state that if Rodney Atkinson became leader of UKIP they and thus their paper, would withdraw any support from UKIP as he was not considered a plausible leader for the party.

This letter was mailed to every member on one of several data bases I was supplied with anonymously.

Shortly after a delivery van arrived at my door and delivered some 7 or 8,000 letters, address labels and envelopes - the letter was a direct copy of an eMail I had sent out with my opinion on the candidates.

It was my contention in this correspondence that after the tempestuous period of Michael Holmes' leadership he was clearly unfit to lead and had withdrawn himself promising not to contest the leadership. I promoted Jeffrey as a calm if uninspiring pair of hands for the party to regroup behind. Jeffrey was elected by the barest of margins which I believe was the grounding of the specious story put about thet I was a spy working for MI6 - clearly a lie but conjoined with a comment from Norman Tebbit that of course the intelligence services had agents in every party. Some of the idiots in UKIP not being the brightest put two and two together and came up with their customary 5! Some are so stupid they repeat this story to this day!

The most likely winner at that election would have been catastrophic for UKIP based on track record and judgement etc.

With hind sight one must wonder if Titford was much better, though better he would seem to have been despite his duplicity, his weakness and his toadying to Farage.

And of course his dishonesty which could not have been predicted unlike Tom Wise's!
Much as Farage may find Titford suitable to manage his feifdom until he retakes the mantle or anoints his next puppet leader - beyond any doubt the manner in which this has been conducted with a corrupt and corrupted NEC selection and a meeting of this invalid and risible claque to appoint the 'chosen one'.

07 Aug 2010
The original complaint was made by Jeffrey Titford - Clark's friend and colleague. Michael Zuckerman, the Party Secretary, even continued to handle the paperwork for this hearing after he informed me that he had withdrawn from the case. ...
18 Aug 2010
A spell of leadership by Tim Congdon would be much along the lines of Geoffrey Titford as leader - namely a safer pair of hands than any of the others on offer! I also believe Tim Congdon would have the advantage over Geoffrey both on ...
18 Aug 2010
Gerard Batten MEP Alan Bown Jeffrey Titford MEP Cllr Jill Seymour (NEC Member) Douglas Denny (NEC Member) Lord Willoughby de Broke (UKIP Peer) END As I recal it was Mandy Rice Davis who said 'well they would say that wouldn't they! ...
24 Aug 2010
It is my opinion that the crass behaviour of discreditted supporters like Andreasen, McGough, The BFM, Croucher, Reeve, NuttAll, Zucherman, Bannerman, Titford, Smith and their ilk will be the downfall of Farage's dwindling party and . ...
 
03 Aug 2010
Denny knows; in October 2005 I acheived an emergency item at the start of the NEC (chaired by Jeffrey Titford MEP) to debate the Tom Wise MEP situation as reported; and much discussed by members often from behind their hand. ...
18 Jan 2010
From: Roger Knapman, Nigel Farage, Jeffrey Titford, Gerard Batten, Godfrey Bloom, Graham Booth, Derek Clark, Tom Wise and John Whittaker To: Petrina Holdsworth. "We were very sorry to see the intemperate, inaccurate and unnecessary ...
20 Aug 2010
Godfrey Bloom MEP John Whittaker MEP Derek Clark MEP Gerard Batten MEP Alan Bown Jeffrey Titford MEP Cllr Jill Seymour (NEC Member) Douglas Denny (NEC Member) Lord Willoughby de Broke (UKIP Peer) . ...
01 Sep 2010
Titford of course was an undertaker, now unwittingly helping to bury UKIP. Interestingly too, when Bob Spink first resigned from the Tory Party, he was described as “UKIP's first MP”. Bob Spink has confirmed to me that he is not a UKIP ...
17 Aug 2010
... liar Geoffrey Titford who tried dishonestly in conclusion with the slime Gulleford and then again the lies and dishonesty of the filth Peter Reeve and his doxy Duffy and of course the lies of Nuttall at the aptly named Ugly meeting! ...
06 Jun 2010
There are I understand outstanding matters against Derek Clarke, which I believe is a similar fraud to Agnew and Bannerman's whilst Booth, Titford, Nattrass and Farage await the next steps – OLAF having completed its first phase having ...
25 May 2010
This is UKIP's official 'e'Mail address operating off of their own server that from time to time I gather Stuart Gulleford (Known as Gollom to most) Jeffrey Titford and his office manager colluded in downloading in total breach of trust ...
09 May 2010
Similar to the letter to Titford at the last General Election! & Knapman at the one before! CLEARLY UKIP LEARNS NOTHING & MAKES NO PROGRESS! Hi, I would very much suggest members of UKIP DO NOT hold their breath in any expectation of ...
08 May 2010
... Godfrey Bloom & Jeffrey Titford the Court totally rejected every aspect of their mallicious vendetta and awarded costs against them - UKIP has a moral duty to refund my costs to the tune of £12500 and Mark Croucher has a legal ...
29 May 2010
... that he sought to promote himself as he was angling dishonestly to take Tom Wise's seat on the gravy train encouraged so to do by Jeffrey Titford, who although he was still the EU's UK Eastern Assembly Region MEP lived in Sussex; ...
11 Feb 2009
We are reliably informed that OLAF has in the last few days sought and received further details relative to possible criminal charges against Jeffrey Titford the EUkip MEP elected to represent the Eastern region who has colluded in lies ...
13 Nov 2009
#722* - Jeffrey TITFORD SHOWS SIGNS OF ISOLATION!! UPDATES: 14:30hrs. including links to documentary evidence 14-Nov-2009. Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable! The corruption of some of EUkip's leadership, their anti UKIP claque ...
14 Mar 2009
OLAF IS INVESTIGATINGEUkip's Jeffrey TITFORDDESPITE THE LIES OF EUkip!Hi,Interestingly what this letter from OLAF does not show is that the rather sad figure of Jeffrey Titford, who is fast loosing the plot, no longer.
06 Feb 2009
Titford's complaint against me was 'substantive'. I understand that this Mr Smith is the same Ian Smith who attended a UKIP meeting held in Newmarket on 27th October 2008. This meeting was organised and chaired by Martin Harvey. ...
24 Nov 2008
As the poison presssssious pen letter states he was at one time responsible for Jeffrey Titford's finances and is thus well informed of the goings on in EUkip's Chelmsford Office. You may recall Ken was Treasurer of UKIP's South Essex ...
03 Dec 2008
The following letter from Jeffrey Titford to Ma Zucherman may well be seen as collusion in an attempt to intimidate a witness - especially since it is possible that John West has not received a copy of this letter having read it on this ...
29 Jan 2009
There are of course others under investigation besides Tom Wise who is under arrest and currently out on bail till the end of February, Jeffrey Titford who having abandoned his constituents by moving out of the region to The South Coast ...
18 Nov 2008
I have spoken to Neil Thomson, Investigator, who has confirmed that they are looking into this case. The case number for Jeffrey Titford is OF/2008/0764. I would strongly advise you to withdraw your allegation that OLAF is not involved. ...
10 Feb 2009
Let us consider your posturing and lies about Jeffrey Titford - I have stated that Jeffrey Titford is under investigation by the British police yet you swallow the lies of Titford when he claims he isn't. ...
03 Feb 2009
SINCE TITFORD IS UNDER INVESTIGATION, CLARK IS UNDER INVESTIGATION, FULLER & GILL ARE UNDER INVESTIGATION, EUkip IS UNDER INVESTIGATION, FARAGE IS UNDER INVESTIGATION, REEVE IS UNDER INVESTIGATION & HOPEFULLY TOWLER IS UNDER ...
10 Jan 2009
The previous leader was Jeffrey Titford and it is well known he lacked the ability or competence to have got himself elected and it was only that I circulated 2 separate letters based upon the fact that there was no other viable ...
06 Feb 2009
as you will by now have read my earlier posting on the lies of Jeffrey Titford, Ma Zucherman and others seemingly with no purpose but to cover up corruption in EUkip and in this instance the lies of Titford and the irrefutable fact that ...
11 Feb 2009
Despite the abuse, despite the attempts at witness intimidation (Which I understand from The Suffolk Police 'will be taken seriously' with the full might of the law against Titford, Ma Zucherman and others involved if it is continued ...
15 Nov 2008
You will note that the paper perpetuates the myth EUkip is 'peddlin' that Gulleford & Titford have been 'cleared' by the police - which is NOT true but the paper has done a bit of its own research proving that OLAF have been passed the ...
10 Dec 2008
The last straw was reading the article in the East Anglian Daily Times on l7th July 2008 headed "UKIP man is quizzed in finance investigation" against Jeffrey Titford and Stuart Gulleford having been triggered by a fellow UKIP member ...
06 Nov 2008
The dishonesty & Corruption of Gulleford & Titford that led to Police investigation now in abeyance pending further direct complaint by Kingscott, Holdsworth and perhaps others for their breech of the data protection act. ...
02 Dec 2008
Perhaps they will wheel poor old Jeffrey Titford out for one last outing before he is handed to his family for full time care - one has to wonder if it is the travel, the pressure of being under investigation by OLAF Case Number ...
26 Jan 2009
Also later in the week I will be proving that Jeffrey Titford is a liar based on factual information that has come to hand from an NEC member. JUNIUS and I are proud to make EUkip more transparent and publish FACTS in our different ...
26 Nov 2008
Jeffrey Titford - all too willing to dishonestly bear false witness for his own gain and protection. I was sent a copy of his distortions and lies bearing dishonest false witness against John West, it was mailed to me by someone close ...
13 Nov 2008
At the request of a member, who was in the employ of EUkip, John West brought to the attention of Christopher Gill & Nigel Farage the member's allegations of corruption, fraud, embezlling & money laundering by Jeffrey Titford. ...
19 Jan 2009
Don't forget that this is the region where a candidate spent about £80000 in an election and ended up scuttling back to the Isle of Mann - the region where Geoffrey Titford and Stuart Gulleford have been investigated by the police and ...
16 Jan 2009
Also do remember that John West will probably be called in the OLAF enquiry into Titford and when it is passed back to The British Police such cases as they decide to bring against Titford and Gulleyford. ...
10 Nov 2008
(who are I understand awaiting response from OLAF on Titford & Gulleford for substantive allegations of fraud, money laundering and embezzling, which one must hope they will be cleared of as they will then possibly be facing ...
05 Jan 2009
... dishonest members of the leadership and NEC to Justice and amongst these I include Nigel Farage, David Bannerman, Paul NuttAll, Peter Reeve, Tom Wise, Jeffrey Titford, Andrew Smith, Stuart Gulleford, David Lott, Marta Andreasen, ...
12 Jan 2009
Then of course the serial phillandery and bad publicity gained by the party performing monkey that has done such harm and the FACT that Titford & Gulleyslime have both been investigated by the Police and Titford is under investigation ...
08 Jan 2009
Then there are the various OLAF enquiries such as derek Clark, Jeffrey Titford, Tom Wise, Nigel Farage and possibly others - also the various Police cases when they re-emerge nearer the election as they surely will. ...
23 Jan 2009
George Curtis sent out a letter criticising one candidate and Jeffrey Titford had sent out an e-mail damaging other candidates. Robin Page considers himself to have been tricked into a situation where the Regional Organiser, ...
04 Feb 2009
He has also colluded in Witness Intimidation in collusion with Jeffrey Titford and similar behaviour related to Niall Warry! It is , of course, entirely your own business Indeed it is and what is your point - we note EUkip's utterly ...
17 Mar 2009
A EUkip MEP Jeffrey TITFORD & SOLICITOR ON THE NEC Ma ZUCHERMEN RAN THIS!!!Hi,I shall deal with these items as I have listed them - they are somewhat random but then again one could hardly accuse the two miscreants -
27 Jan 2009
Does the name Jeffrey Titford ring a bell? 26/1/9 at 02:09 PM “Paul, and you believe you are being a friend in posting what you have, I have deliberately chosen not to engage in any reference to the situation, which cannot be said of ...
11 Jan 2009
Gollom had gone to ground, Titford had of course moved to Sussex and he was now under investigation on several counts by the Police in the region - one of which was considered of sufficient gravity that the Police have passed the file ...
11 Feb 2009
... hard with his corrupt and dishonest cronies and puppets like Ma Zucherman, Douglas Denny, Paul NuttAll, Mark Croucher, Derek Clark MEP, Jeffrey Titford MEP, David Bannerman, Mick McGough, Andrew Smith, Marta Andreasen and others. ...

Make your vote count vote:
 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance
or Write on YOUR ballot Paper 

#Doc049* - UKIP - Rules for the conduct of NEC ELECTIONS

#Doc049* -  UKIP - Rules for the conduct of NEC ELECTIONS

Rules for the conduct of NEC elections

Thursday, 29th November 2007

Rules for the conduct of elections 
to the National Executive Committee (NEC)

1 Returning Officer

1.1 The NEC shall appoint a Returning Officer in accordance with Paragraph 10.2 of the Constitution.

1.2 The Returning Officer shall not be a Candidate, a Proposer, Seconder or Assentor of any Candidate or a paid or unpaid employee of any Candidate.

1.3 The NEC shall either:

1.3.1 Appoint an independent agency to conduct the election according to rules to be agreed with said agency; or

1.3.2 Instruct the Returning Officer to conduct the election in accordance with Sections 5 to 9 of these Party Election rules.

2 Timetable

2.1 The Returning Officer shall establish a timetable which shall include:

2.1.1 closing date for Candidate nominations;

2.1.2 closing date for receipt of Candidates' CVs & photographs;

2.1.3 closing date for Candidates wishing to withdraw;

2.1.4 approximate date for distribution of voting papers/Candidates' details;

2.1.5 closing date for return of voting papers;

2.1.6 expected date of Count and Declaration of result.

2.2 The Returning Officer shall publish, in the Party newsletter penultimate to the date of the election, the timetable for the election, the number of posts to be filled and instructions for Candidates seeking nomination.

3 Nominations

3.1 A valid nomination shall consist of a Candidate's consent to nomination and the signatures of a Proposer, a Seconder and eight Assentors. All must be fully paid-up party members on the closing date for nominations.

3.2 Proposers and Seconders may propose or second only one Candidate's nomination forms.

3.3 Assentors may sign Candidates' papers not exceeding the number of posts to be filled

3.4 Candidates who have been full members for less than one year at the closing date for nominations must be proposed and seconded by members who have been full members for more than one year at the said date.

3.5 Candidates who work in any paid capacity as an employee, self-employed or as a consultant, either directly or indirectly, for the Party, for Party members elected to public office or for political groups and organisations of which the Party holds membership (together called 'Connected Parties') may stand but shall not be permitted to continue with such paid work and hold elected office simultaneously. If any such person is elected to any such Party Office and does not terminate their work in any paid capacity with such Connected Parties then they shall be deemed to have resigned from such Elected Office.

3.6 Nominations shall not be accepted from members who are currently suspended from holding Party office.

4 Campaigning


4.1 Each Candidate shall be entitled to have their details published in a medium deemed appropriate by the Returning Officer that shall be sent to all members eligible to vote along with the voting papers. These details shall consist of the names of the Candidate's Proposer, Seconder, and Assentors, a personal statement (number of words to be set by the Returning Officer) and a recent photograph. The Returning Officer may require any misleading information to be amended or deleted and may require other relevant information to be added.
4.2 Candidates and their supporters shall not distribute any unsolicited material by any means whatsoever.

4.3 Candidates may distribute printed material, approved by the Returning Officer in advance, to Party members who request it. Said material shall not exceed four sides (two pages) of A4 paper for any Candidate and shall be printed in black and white only.

4.4 Candidates’ personal statements may include references to internet websites, provided that the material presented on the website(s) has been approved by the Returning Officer.

4.5 Candidates may respond individually to specific enquiries from Party members without reference to the Returning Officer.

4.6 Candidates and their supporters are reminded that campaigning activities should be conducted in a friendly and constructive manner, and that they remain at all times bound by the Party Constitution and rules. Any breaches may be referred to the Party's Discipline Committee and could result in disciplinary action. In the case of a serious breach, the Returning Officer may disqualify a Candidate from the election. A Candidate disqualified in this way may appeal to the Discipline Committee. Any such appeal must be lodged in full within one month of the date of disqualification.

4.7 Candidates and their supporters are reminded that use of Party membership lists is subject to data protection legislation, and that improper use of such lists is a criminal offence.

5 Voting Papers

5.1 One voting paper shall be sent by post to each full member eligible to vote who is registered as a member on the closing date for nominations.

5.2 Voting papers shall be accompanied by a pre-addressed return envelope and sheets containing candidates’ statements and other details.

5.3 The return envelope shall be pre-addressed and the membership number of the voter shall be pre-printed on it.

5.5 These items shall be sent to members' home addresses as shown on the party's membership records. A copy of the mailing list shall be retained by the Returning Officer.

5.4 Each voting paper shall list the candidates in alphabetical order and shall carry the following instructions:

5.4.1 Votes are to be by means of crosses, the number of crosses to not exceed the number of posts to be filled.

5.4.2 Completed voting paper to be folded, inserted into the return envelope and posted.

5.5 Envelopes containing completed voting papers shall be counted daily as they are received, the membership number on the envelope verified against the membership database and verified envelopes then stored securely by the Returning Officer or his nominee.

5.6 Envelopes containing completed voting papers shall not be opened until the day of the count.

6 Spoiled voting papers

6.1 A member who spoils a ballot paper may request a replacement which will be sent out by first class post. Replacement return envelopes will not be issued.

7 The Count


7.1 The count shall be conducted in the presence of the Returning Officer or his deputy, at a location to be announced by the Returning Officer.

7.2 Candidates and their appointees, as permitted by the Returning Officer, may attend the count.

7.3 The Returning Officer shall appoint staff to assist in the count. Candidates and their appointees shall not be permitted to assist in the count.

7.4.1 counting the number of voting papers returned; 

7.4.2 identification and count of invalid voting papers;

7.4.3 calculation of the turnout (number of valid voting papers returned / number of voting papers issued);

7.4.4 calculation the number of votes cast for each Candidate.

7.5 A Candidate may request a recount in the event of a close result or if he or she believes there has been an error or discrepancy in the count. The Returning Officer may refuse to hold a recount requested for frivolous or spurious reasons.

7.6 In the event of a tie, a coin shall be tossed, or lots drawn to determine final placings.

7.7 The Returning Officer shall produce a signed declaration of the results and announce the results of the elections as soon as the count has been completed to his satisfaction.

7.8 All voting papers, calculation sheets and a copy of the signed declaration shall be stored in sealed packages, countersigned by an independent witness, to be stored at the discretion of the Returning Officer for not less than twelve months from the date of the count.

7.9 The Returning Officer's decision in all matters relating to the Count shall be final.

8 Doubtful voting intentions

8.1 Where there is doubt about voting intentions, the Returning Officer may ask Candidates to agree how to count the vote, but the Returning Officer's decision shall be final.

9 Invalid voting papers

9.1 A voting paper shall be declared invalid if:

9.1.1 the voter has voted for more than the permitted number of Candidates; or

9.1.4 the intentions of the voter cannot be deciphered; or

9.1.5 the voting paper has not been received by the day of the count.

10 General

10.1 Successful candidates shall be required to confirm in writing within seven days of the declaration of the result acceptance of the said post.

10.2 All candidates shall be sent a copy of these rules.

10.3 Any member shall be sent a copy of these rules on request.

10.4 These rules shall always be subordinate to the Party Constitution.

10.5 Any variation of these rules shall be agreed by the NEC and the Returning Officer and notified immediately to all Candidates.


Make your vote count vote:
 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance
or Write on YOUR ballot Paper 

Monday, 30 August 2010

#Doc048* - Skeptyk by NAME & Septyk by NATURE 01

#Doc048* - Skeptyk by NAME & Septyk by NATURE 01
Clean EUkip up NOW  &  make UKIP electable!  
The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership,    
their anti UKIP claque in POWER &  the NEC 
is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!   

SKEPTYK by name SEPTYK BY NATURE -
I have yet to see spin from UKIP that does not damage the Party!

Hi,

I rarely read the drivel from UKIP's spin machine as I find it is so dishonest and distatefull - packed with lies and distracting fantasies.

The Leadership of UKIP and their parasites would seem to be so stupid that they do not realise the supporters of UKIP are those who seek to get rid of them, clean up UKIP and make it electable NOT those seeking status and enrichment!


I decided against the prize as it was too subjective as so many in UKIP's leadership believe attacking and defaming their critics is defending UKIP when in fact attacking the messenger and unable to address the criticism is a mark of dishonesty and incompetence on the part of the name caller - so very UKIP!

We watch Croucher, Denny, Skeptyk, McTrough and others perpetually making fools of themselves and then believing repetition of their dishonesty and misrepresentation in some way makes it true - they are that stupid! - it is in fact a measure of their stupidity as they overlook the FACT that individuals like my self are not seeking votes or power nor to feed from the public purse.

Douglas Denny for instance is ONLY of ANY significance BECAUSE he seeks aggrandisement, authority and influence representing others as do Croucher, McTrough and others and as are those seeking to destroy UKIP by upholding corruption like Skeptyk and others of the anti UKIP faction.


That I am attacked, lied about defamed and libeled on the internet is hardly surprising as I spend almost all my time rooting out corruption, seeking out and exposing the Snake Oil Salesmen who feed on the underbelly of life, the weak, the gullible and the ill informed - people just like Skeptyk who set up web sites, blogs and forums in desperate attempts to defame me as do the Politicians and paedophiles all seeking to denigrate me to try to pretend that in attacking the messenger they are in some way adding credibility to their own status.


Indeed people like Skeptyk are that stupid! Repeating the libels and fantasies of each other these low lifes seek to dupe people - who I am is utterly irrelevant - I am merely the messenger, hence so few of the scum contact me to verify anything and so many of the decent folk pass on or seek out the facts.


For example this was sent to me by another UKIP supporter so:


As an aside the Party Spin Machine - to assist Bloom, was in overdrive rapidly and at 07:35hrs. today. One of their staff was pumping out typical UKIP spin filth:

This 'evidence' of Bloom's influencing the election - one must come up with something a lot better than that. I could go into my office right now, change the name and number of the firm that appears on all sent faxes and send anything I damn well like to anyone and offer it as proof. I mean, come on, this is absolutely ridiculous. In fact, I could create a fax proporting to come from GLW to Nick Griffin, confirming his attendance at another one of his huntsman weekends.
And I have to say that reading GLW and Junius' bleats about this alleged influencing by Bloom is very rich when one considers that they themselves have been publishing their own opinions and preferred candidates. That level of hypocrisy is up there with Gerry Adams' demands for the Bloody Sunday enquiry whilst ignoring demands for enquiries into their own little massacres like Kingsmill, La Mon, Enniskillen to name but a few.

No wonder the press staff/team are too ashamed to put their name to their filth and lies - they always have been.

Lets look at this desparate attempt to distract and lie:

This 'evidence' of Bloom's influencing the election
Is irrefutable - a letter and filled in form received by 100s of members - even perhaps 1,000s.






- one must come up with something a lot better than that.

No one needs to, the facts are totally damning.

I could go into my office right now, change the name and number of the firm that appears on all sent faxes and send anything I damn well like to anyone and offer it as proof.

Go ahead - no one has believed the press office of UKIP for years - is it any surprise they are treated with such contempt by the media at large and why almost without exception the media hate UKIP.

It started out with Mark Croucher telling lies to the press then stating UKIP's MEPs and leadership were 'f*ckwits' to save himself.

Then Mark Croucher dishonesty and lies regarding the Press Complaints Commission when he so clearly lied to con them over Roger Knapman's people traffiking business with his son. The PCC soon saw through that and tossed it out.

Then we had Mark Croucher's lies pretending Tom Wise had been cleared of his Fraud, Money Laundering, False Accounting and Stealing of UKIP funding on the UKIP web page, The EU soon ordered you to remove that pack of lies!

I mean, come on, this is absolutely ridiculous.

Yes but I've yet to see a Skeptyk posting that isn't absolutely ridiculous that doesn't damage UKIP as it lies, distorts, insults, defames and befouls the image of UKIP, in public, for its corrupt masters! Much as do Douglas Denny, Mick McTrough and their sordid and dishonest ilk.

In fact, I could create a fax proporting to come from GLW to Nick Griffin, confirming his attendance at another one of his huntsman weekends.

But you did try to do just that and every one saw through it - I wonder when the entirety of UKIP will ever be as consistently outspoken against racism, anti Judaism, support for homosexuals, active against child and spousal abuse,as I have been on my own.

Let us remember that it was UKIP's dishonest spin team that claimed Piers Merchant was Junius when they knew he was dieing and then fudged some cr@p together from UKIP's computer when they were shown to be just that vile.

It was of course Mark Croucher who published all those lies in UKIP's in house comic, when he was editor, a desparate attempt to claim that Richard Suchorzewski was a supporter of The BNP and a homosexual - when in fact John Bufton - who, too gutless to speak out against corruption, as it might spoil his route to being a boot licker and becoming an MEP - John KNEW Richard was the son of a Polish immigrant who had fought with the resistance & the British army, when his Mother & Father had been taken to death camps and Richard's great grandfather was hanged in the street from a lamp post!

John Bufton also KNEW that Richards long term girlfriend was a St, Kitts girl who lived in London and was a Sister at a Major Prestige Central London Hospital.


Did John Bufton speak out? Well of course not he is typical UKIP MEP material.


It was in the same issue that Mark Croucher tried to imply I was something to do with The BNP making a fool of himself and bringing UKIP further into disrepute as it further lied in its official capacity!


Let us remember Croucher had to try to fudge evidence and tell lies to seek to befoul me by trying to link me with Nick Griffin yet when it came to the EU Selection process, that UKIP did so much to corrupt from September onwards, Farage was promoting The BNP at every opportunity and in the January Mark Croucher openly joined in - including telling lies to journalists to raise the profile of Thee BNP.


Then Farage set up a racist, anti Jewish, anti Homosexual, holocaust denialist pro EU membership Pan EU Political Group The EFD which Godfrey Bloom and all the UKIP MEPs were happy to be members of, except Nikkie Sinclaire who quit at the first opportunity to face lies and defamation from the filth that is UKIP's MEP team, including Croucher who became Media Manager for this new filth!

And I have to say that reading GLW and Junius' bleats about this alleged influencing by Bloom is very rich when one considers that they themselves have been publishing their own opinions and preferred candidates.

Firstly I am not an MEP, whose duty is to uphold the Party Rules.

Secondly I have not used money from the public purse to achieve the scam.

Thirdly I have acted, although not bound by them - within UKIP's rules which clearly state that web site comment is acceptable.
Fourthy - much as it would help the filth that is UKIP's leadership to let its members vote in on the basis of MEP / Leadership advice so as to continue the corruption that is clearly endemic.

There is clearly no similarity, however the Party Spin Liars try to manipulate their filth.

That level of hypocrisy is up there with Gerry Adams' demands for the Bloody Sunday enquiry whilst ignoring demands for enquiries into their own little massacres like Kingsmill, La Mon, Enniskillen to name but a few.

One notes UKIP's slime are all to good at revolting comparisons with themselves and their own behaviour.

We note Skeptyk lays claim to a daughter in hospital - since we do not know your identity because you are too cowardly and too much filth to put your name to your vile comments - if she inherited your genes let us hope she is incapacitated relative to any executive or communicative function for ever more!

One wonders if it is the daughter who gives you errections in the bath or the one who threw you out of her flat or just another fantasy figure like your vile self Skeptyc by name Septyk by nature!


~~~~~~######~~~~~~


For The Record:


I do not know who is sheltering in shame behind the cowardly anonymity of the name Skeptyc - nor do I overly much care and nor would I wish to wittingly meet someone so habitually dishonest.


I have from time to time speculated on who it might be based on people within and associated with UKIP who I know to be corrupt and fundamentally dishonest.


That such dishonest and cowardly scum as contribute to Skeptyk dishonest output indubitably brings the leadership of UKIP into disrepute.


That I do not know the contributor or contributors - nor have I ever stated that I do, though I have speculated - I am utterly indifferent if they had dropped dead yesterday along with some 350,000 others who did yesterday - that their daughter may have inherited their vile personality, dishonesty and cowardly demeanour AND an interest in politics leads me to hope her present hospitalisation may hamper her involvement in politics for ever more - her Father lacks the moral fiber I would wish to see in Politics, as I might add do all of those within the leadership of UKIP and its utterly corrupt management - self serving trash to a man!


JUNIUS which has more than one contributor. That JUNIUS is seeking to expose the truth based on facts, with very few errors over approaching 2 years, and seeking to expose corruption from withing UKIP does make the position of anonymity understandable. JUNIUS and I clearly seek to present the truth as openly stated supporters of the values and principles that were UKIP as understood by its grass roots members - if on occasions I make an error in what is now approaching 2,000 full blogs on UKIP please do not hesitate to let me know and it WILL be corrected but your communication is unlikely to be read if you lack the integrity to put your identifiable name to it. Over well over a dozen years I have had to make approximately 3 minor corrections and not a single major one - I try very hard to publish the truth backed by facts - Unlike UKIP and its mouthpieces.

It is my opinion that the dishonest and corrupt output of Skeptyc is similarly produced by more than one person each telling lies for the other. That there may well be more than one contributor to Skeptyc's lies is probable. That Skeptyc is striving to uphold the corruption, dishonesty and lies of UKIP and attack the supporters who seek to see a strong, honourable and effective UKIP NOT populated by the filth currently amongst its leadership, MEPs, staff, NEC and wanabes esposes Skeptyc's anonymity as dishonourable, cowardly and shamefull - the body politic would be greatly enhanced by his, her, its or their demise.

Skeptyc by Name SEPTIC by Nature


~~~~~~######~~~~~~



MORE LIES & COWARDLY FILTH FROM SKEPTYK
Hi,

It was an interesting coincidence that I had just written roughly this text on the blog pages of a few of the more damaging liars and anti UKIP trash  that are members of the leadership team of UKIP, their parasites and supporters
I rarely read the drivel from UKIP's spin machine as I find it is so dishonest and distatefull - packed with lies and distracting fantasies.


The Leadership of UKIP and their parasites would seem to be so stupid that they do not realise the supporters of UKIP are those who seek to get rid of them, clean up UKIP and make it electable NOT those seeking status and enrichment!




I decided against the prize as it was too subjective as so many in UKIP's leadership believe attacking and defaming their critics is defending UKIP when in fact attacking the messenger and unable to address the criticism is a mark of dishonesty and incompetence on the part of the name caller - so very UKIP!


We watch Croucher, Denny, Skeptyk, McTrough and others perpetually making fools of themselves and then believing repetition of their dishonesty and misrepresentation in some way makes it true - they are that stupid! - it is in fact a measure of their stupidity as they overlook the FACT that individuals like my self are not seeking votes or power nor to feed from the public purse.


Douglas Denny for instance is ONLY of ANY significance BECAUSE he seeks aggrandisement, authority and influence representing others as do Croucher, McTrough and others and as are those seeking to destroy UKIP by upholding corruption like Skeptyk and others of the anti UKIP faction.

That I am attacked, lied about defamed and libeled on the internet is hardly surprising as I spend almost all my time rooting out corruption, seeking out and exposing the Snake Oil Salesmen who feed on the underbelly of life, the weak, the gullible and the ill informed - people just like Skeptyk who set up web sites, blogs and forums in desperate attempts to defame me as do the Politicians and paedophiles all seeking to denigrate me to try to pretend that in attacking the messenger they are in some way adding credibility to their own status.

Indeed people like Skeptyk are that stupid! Repeating the libels and fantasies of each other these low lifes seek to dupe people - who I am is utterly irrelevant - I am merely the messenger, hence so few of the scum contact me to verify anything and so many of the decent folk pass on or seek out the facts.

Then whilst answering a few questions on the phone, for one of UKIP's more dedicated members, to help them, I clicked onto Anthony Butcher's corrupt and squalid forum - to find Skeptyk was performing almost to order, just as had the corrupt idiots Douglas Denny and Mick McTrough.

SCUM is very predictable in a septic tank - it floats to the top!


Skeptyk has provided a perfect example of this - so lets look at their self destructive maunderings:

But as we are getting so moralistic over the profiting of such 'exploitative' behaviour,
A comment on the apparent morality of one of UKIP's more self serving excrecences - the multi Millionaire Willian Earl of Dartmouth whose latest wife has just sold a flat in Australia for 11Million - we note Dartmouth has never featured as a donor ! We also note he, like the rest of UKIP's MEPs has never produced and presented accounts but the media have exposed him as a pornographer of some note being a Director of one of Hanson's companies and profitting from the debasement of society as a pornographer.

Hardly in keeping with the principles and family values of UKIP but all too normal for the anti UKIP leadership and its parasites.
I would like to ask Tim, our resident spambot/guardian of morals,
An individual who does not use his full name for understandable reasons with filth like Skeptyk all too ready to attack the man not the message in as vile and cowardly way as they can.
what he thinks of the inescapable fact that one of the sponsored links (ie one that makes money) on a website belonging to his hero GLW is to a website that makes light of rape and child abuse
Skeptyk is a LIAR - that they repeats the lies of someone else does not in ANY way exonerate their dishonesty.

Please identify the web site I supposedly own and the link claimed.

Please be so good as to show that in any way by any means I profit from any use of the internet - save by vending legitimate goods from time to time via eBay (historic or my now defunct GlanceBack web site selling stamps, coins, medals etc.)
A site from which I am blocked as they find it expedient to lie and defame me behind my back- in fact this is the link that comes up when as claimed by Skeptyc I click on his link http://www.yourjokes.co.uk/
 exactly the sort of behaviour I would expect of Skeptyc - but in fact more likely in this instance to be the gutter broadcaster in America Paul Drockton, who is deriving cash per click out of posting defamatory and sick sites all over the internet and aiding paedophiles and pederasts, abusers and exploiters by providing a platform and support for a collection of utterly corrupt con artists including Robert Green, Brian Gerrish, David Icke, Belinda McKenzie, Matt Quinn and others.

May I also point out that the other damaging piece of anti UKIP Filth Douglas Denny is also a supporter and correspondent of Paul Drockton's for proof and details CLICK HERE

Skeptyc may also be interested in Paul Drockton's opinions on other matters or his vile and debased attack on his own son, since they are obviously devotees who are happy to quote his efforts without any sense of integrity, decency or morality CLICK HERE
Or here is another piece of filth that would be abot the standard of the anti UKIP brigade of Skeptyc, Denny, McTrough and their ilk CLICK HERE
As Tim has a finely tuned antenna for what he views as immoral behaviour, I fully expect that he will be offering us all very stern criticism of his leader GLW’s antics (which are made even more grotesque by the fact that GLW claims to be a defender of those who were abused).
I think it is very clear that yet again the only grotesque behaviour here is that of the likes of Skeptyk, Croucher, McTrough, Denny and those who do such harm to UKIP by refusing to permit it being cleaned up and endlessly dragging it into the gutter where they live to aid corruption and sabotage the EUroRealist movement, on which many of them are dependent for a living - heaven forefend the EU might be dismantled or Britain might escape its malign clutch for where would these filth derive their status and in many cases income!
Or will Tim do what he normally does – run away when he doesn’t like the quest
Perhaps this piece of dishonest filth Skeptyk could identify one phrase of veracity that is of ANY consequence in his endless slime filled cowardly attacks on such UKIP supporters as Tim, Niall Warry, Dr. Abbott, Piers Merchant, Marcus Stead, Richard Suchorzewski, John Pratt, myself, Geoffrey Collier, John West, Petrina Holdsworth, Marilyn Swain, Peter Baker, Simon Muir, Dr. Eric Edmond, and their like - dedicated over many years to seeking a way out of The EU, resolute and determined - in fact hard working supporters of UKIP and the cause its members of principle support.

It is the likes of Douglas Denny, Mick McTrough,, Kevin Mahoney, George Thomas, Mark Croucher, Gawain Towler, Paul Nuttall, Derek Clark, David Bannerman, Marta Andreasen, Hugh Williams, Peter Reeve, George Curtis, Gulleford, Graham Booth, William Dartmouth, Malcolm Pearson, Malcolm Wood, and their ilk and cowardly filth and scum like Skeptyk in UKIP's leadership and its parasites that have ensured that in 17 years UKIP has only ever achieved a few stupid stunts and a top vote of 3.1% in a General Election and out of some 19,000 available electable seats less than 30.

They are the real anti UKIP trash, as proven again and again.

The decent moral patriotic members of UKIP must be so ashamed to be associated with these charlatans, low lifes and self serving trash - clearly the British public want nothing to do with them.

Look at UKIP's results with such trash in situ - it can not be the cause as the huge majority of Britain's peoples espouse the same cause as UKIP's members - it is the leadership and its vile parasites and paid praise singers.

Embarrassing as the logic may be it is clear and irrefutable.

I have this strange feeling that Skeptyk is unlikely to publish this blog by way of apology on Butcher's squalid Forum where Skeptyc is so at home with their vile attacks, lies and key board bragadoccio in cowardly anonymity!

PERHAPS THOSE WHO GENUINELY CARE ABOUT OTHERS Might care to consider assisting with one of my other projects which can best be understood if you Go To http://StolenKids-Bloggers.com and follow some of the links. I have been involved in exposing paedophiles, campaigning for decriminalisation of homosexuality, exposing corruption on the public purse, opposing racism and the like for best part of half a Century now - perhaps you would care to consider your position and possibly help if you can.


~~~~~~######~~~~~~
A MESSAGE FROM THE CREEP SEPTYK and a reply!

-----Original Message-----
From: The Skeptyk [mailto:theskeptyk@yahoo.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 6:58 AM
To: Greg@GlanceBack.Demon.co.UK; Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com
Subject: Updated Skeptyk blog

I thought today's updated blog would be of interest to you.

Have a pleasant day



Tel:      UK: 01291 – 62 65 62

Hi,

I’m sure your squalid little blog makes you feel important – frankly knowing how damaging you are to the prospect of Britain’s liberty and your track record of dishonesty and consistent cowardice – frankly I can’t be bothered looking at it.

Just consider the source!

Skeptyk by Name and Septyk by NATURE!

Why would I want to read your lies and self serving filth?

I have visited your squalid little blog once, when you were dishonestly making a tastless and cowardly attack on John West in the most vile and tasteless manner and I haven’t bothered since.

Why would anyone want to voluntarily enter a Skeptyk Tank!

You are too embarrassed by your sleeze to even put your name to it, you cowardly little excrecence.


If the anti UKIP shower of self enriching scheisters and liars were thrown out and their parasites dumped there MIGHT be some hope for UKIP but 3.1% vote after 17 years shows what contempt the public hold for the likes of you.

As I ALWAYS post in my own identifiable name, and so far in 64 years can think of not one thing I am ashamed of nor an instance or action in my life I am not happy for the public at large to know and am not asking for anyone’s vote, nor do I seek to represent ANYONE - save my honestly held beliefs, and having NEVER drawn one bean in benefit or claim, I have absolutely no interest in your lies and vile attacks on UKIP supporters, in defence of the corrupt leadership, who I hold in utter contempt to a man, I couldn’t give a damn what posturing you do, you irrelevant cowardly pea brained pervert.

Further since my friends know exactly who I am and anyone who follows your filth or believes anything you say is unlikely to be a friend of mine, if they are remotely interested in your childish behaviour or stupid enough to believe you, let me know as I would not even want them as friends.

Invent, distort and write what you like you pathetic little creep.

By the way anyone wanting to read this sad creep’s blog is welcome to defile their time The URL is apparently:
though I haven’t tested the link.


Your site is far more likely to say a great deal; much more accurately, about the cowardly poster; than it does about me and I care not what some sad troll writes on any subject – it is why I rarely visit Anthony Butchers sordid little forum which seems inhabited by the scum of the septic tank that is UKIP’s leadership endlessly attacking and abusing genuine decent UKIP supporters who patriotically have Britain’s good at heart not their bank accounts and status.
It is such a shame that UKIP is so defiled with this sort of filth acting on behalf of its leadership against its interests. Scouring the gutters of life looking for some morsal of filth to feed on.

No wonder out of about 19,000 electable seats in British Governance UKIP, with its present pond life of paid praise singers and other parasites like this anonymous coward, have less than 30, by election, I understand.

With filth and liars like Septyk, McTrough, Dippy Denny, David Bannerman, Godfrey Bloom, Peter Reeve, Mark Croucher, Gawain Towler, Derek Clark, Stuart Gulleford and the rest of the Racist, anti Jewish, homophobic filth on their side there is little hope for the Party the members of which I have supported constantly in an effort to clean up the trash that pretend to lead.

Now run along and preen in your mirror because like the rest of UKIP’s leadership you offend common decency and drag the party into the gutter you inhabit.

Regards,
Greg L-W.

This was posted on 30-Aug-2010 at: CLICK HERE


Make your vote count vote:
 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance
or Write on YOUR ballot Paper